-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 99
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
An end to Consumption and Consumerism #231
Conversation
Putting an end to the idea that retail therapy will make us happy.
|
||
Our entire society and economy is centred around the principle of continued economic growth driven by ever increasing consumption. Everyone in society is put under pressure to put in more hours at work, to aim for the next promotion, to get a better salary, to get a bigger house and fill it with more things - depsite the fact this rarely leads to increased happiness or contentment. We feel pressure to do so because it's expected of us, because of peer and family pressure, and because of the constant stream of advertising on the web, TV, radio and billboards. The Government encourage this in order to grow the economy forever more, whilst ignoring the fact it creates feelings of peer inadequacy, is causing chronic physical and mental exhaustion in our workforce, is fuelling an obesity crisis, and is hugely damaging to our natural environment. | ||
|
||
This manifesto would encourage the Government to recognsise that this is hugely damaging, and to take an alternative approach that would provide a sustainable economy with a greater emphasis on physical and mental wellbeing, to pursue careers that focuses on self-development and professional contentment, and to steer society away from consumerism. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Propose changing "This manifesto would encourage the Government to" to "We" with corresponding small fixes in the rest of the sentence.
It's not a policy as such, is it, but worth saying 👍 |
Good amendment. I shall update the PR. *Paul * about.me/pauljrobinson http://about.me/pauljrobinson On 11 October 2014 13:16, philipjohn notifications@github.com wrote:
|
I'd like to add a few things on how we approach this problem but yes 👍 to principle. I think we should argue for a redefinition of growth. I think somewhere else in the manifesto we've touched on alternative measures etc., so yeah... I'll add thoughts soon. |
Replaced "We want the government to recognise" with "We recognise"
👍 from me still. @digitalWestie Are you still happy with Paul's latest changes? |
👍 |
👍 here |
This proposal is open for discussion and voting. If you are a contributor to this repository (and not the proposer), you may vote on whether or not it is accepted. How to voteVote by entering one of the following symbols in a comment on this pull request. Only your last vote will be counted, and you may change your vote at any time until the change is accepted or closed.
Proposals will be accepted and merged once they have a total of 2 points when all votes are counted. Votes will be open for a minimum of 7 days, but will be closed if the proposal is not accepted after 90. Votes are counted automatically here, and results are set in the merge status checks below. ChangesIf the proposer makes a change to the proposal, no votes cast before that change will be counted. |
Putting an end to the idea that retail therapy will make us happy.