You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Some of the Assessor Identification Numbers were incorrectly added to some buildings (problem created by the county dataset). Here's a list that need to be resolved. Mostly it seems we can use an Overpass-turbo query to find them, download them, remove their assessor-related data (everything excluding height, ele, building ID) and upload fixes. At a later date we can try and find buildings without assessor attributes.
AINs should be unique to one parcel or property, not spread across a large geographic area.
Some of the Assessor Identification Numbers were incorrectly added to some buildings (problem created by the county dataset). Here's a list that need to be resolved. Mostly it seems we can use an Overpass-turbo query to find them, download them, remove their assessor-related data (everything excluding height, ele, building ID) and upload fixes. At a later date we can try and find buildings without assessor attributes.
AINs should be unique to one parcel or property, not spread across a large geographic area.
Here's a sampling.
7217018107
7352002029
7412024006 -> https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/vMS
7436034903
7315017005
7315006003
4089012902
7440002032
7542024003
7563006018
4157009045
7409029011
7413022011
7237022007
7412022010
4155010054
7439015900
7569012027
In the coming days/weeks I'll review the top values for lacounty:ain in taginfo and work through these.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: