Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

request.action? #843

Closed
activestylus opened this issue May 1, 2012 · 1 comment
Closed

request.action? #843

activestylus opened this issue May 1, 2012 · 1 comment
Labels
feature
Milestone
0.11.0

Comments

@activestylus
Copy link
Contributor

In padrino I can do request.controller but I can't do request.action - reflecting on this a bit I see why this would not be included, as it depends on us naming our routes, which a lot of people don't do. But how about a convention that when the route IS named, we have access to it from the request object?

Food for thought...
@ujifgc
Copy link
Member

ujifgc commented Jan 12, 2013

#1004 implements it

dariocravero pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jan 12, 2013
Merge pull request #1004 from ujifgc/route-action
0715970 
Add request.action to implement #843
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
feature
Projects
None yet
Milestone
0.11.0
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@activestylus @ujifgc @dariocravero