Replies: 8 comments 8 replies
-
|
We have not finalized it per se on a document, it has only been discussed. Just one more todo in our list In short:
After that, we will switch from the MVC pattern to the ADR one, making Phalcon as slim and customizable as possible while keeping performance as fast as possible. But that is quite a long way, we still have to release v5 and that is quite a lot of work. Of course an extension will always be much faster than PHP code and it will use less memory. We are however introducing benchmarks to ensure that any change we make, speeds up the framework. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
What is the reason for moving from MVC to ADR? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Hi @niden, If we create our application with Phalcon V4, we can expect after releasing V5, it's quite working too? Because I'm trying to use Do you think when V5 will be released, with all part of v4? Thanks. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
@AliShareei v5 is not ready yet - you can see it really, classes are missing for now. The goal is to have v5 as identical to v4 as possible. We are aiming for a drop in replacement or at least very very minimal changes from v4 to v5. v5 will contain everything v4 has already :) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
@niden, I think it's a good idea to make compatible these two different versions. Do you think we can have v5 until May? I mean within 4-5 months later? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
This is where we are with v5 so far: https://github.com/orgs/phalcon/projects/5 Still quite a few cards to do but the ones that are done, the tests are passing and the changes are minimal if any for each component/namespace |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Quite possible. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
How much loss will we got when we move to a pure php framework from a c extension ？The high performance and friendly restful api route are the most important reasons that why we choose phalcon. Maybe we should choose other C extension library if we got too much performance loss，evenif the other library has a very unfriendly route. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
The loss of performance is unknown at this point. The work in progress at the moment for v6 (pure PHP) will include a set of benchmarks for the framework to ensure that we have a measure of how fast the framework is. We will introduce those benchmarks on the v5 version (extension) and see where we have the highest loss of performance. After that, we will also introduce an extension that will "override" the php based classes or methods when the extension is loaded. This has been successfully tested and works in the Tensor library. If the extension is not loaded, then the PHP code continues to run, otherwise it uses the extension. This way we can have people that want this extra performance install the supplementary extension and get a higher performance from the framework. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
thank you! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Is Phalcon v5 ready for Production use, using PHP8.x ? Please suggest with few relevant links. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
My personal opinion: v5 is quite ready for use in production, one of the e-commerce shop that uses Phalcon v5 RC3 - https://ankas.ru |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Which PHPx version is it using ? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
PHP 8.1 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Is compatibility with PHP 8.2 will be delayed til 5,1? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Depends how much changes there will be in Zephir. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
What's the Phalcon 5 roadmap?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions