Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Implement TX as FSM #209

Open
tdz opened this issue Dec 18, 2017 · 0 comments
Open

Implement TX as FSM #209

tdz opened this issue Dec 18, 2017 · 0 comments

Comments

@tdz
Copy link
Member

tdz commented Dec 18, 2017

Bugs like PR #208 show up because the TX code is hard to understand. Instead of the current ad-hoc implementation, transaction state and transitions should be implemented as finite state machine.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@tdz