Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

get_min_oa_cfm_sch_zone when "minimum_outdoor_airflow_multiplier_schedule" is missing #1262

Open
weilixu opened this issue Jan 18, 2024 · 4 comments
Assignees

Comments

@weilixu
Copy link
Collaborator

weilixu commented Jan 18, 2024

@KarenWGard @claperle
In this function, we check if the terminal has minimum_outdoor_airflow_multiplier_schedule. If the schedule is not included in the RPD, then hourly_cfm_oa_x = 0.

When doing integrated test, I noticed EnergyPlus assumes the multiplier_schedule value to 1 if the schedule is not specified in the input file.
image
The issue appears when translating EPlus model to RPD where the multiplier schedule is not specified in the OA object. This causes the RPD file missing minimum_outdoor_airflow_multiplier_schedule in the terminal data group.

So my question is which approach is more acceptable? hourly_cfm_oa_x = 0 if missing multiplier_schedule or hourly_cfm_oa_x = 1 if missing multiplier_schedule?

@claperle
Copy link
Collaborator

@weilixu This seems more like an issue with how E+ is being translated to the RPD. If it defaults to 1 and that is what is being modeled then I think that should be translated to the RPD.

@weilixu
Copy link
Collaborator Author

weilixu commented Jan 18, 2024

like an issue with how E+ is being translated to the RPD. If it defaults to 1 and that is what is being modeled then I think that should be translated to the RPD.

Yea, I agree. The question is actually for clarification - if assigning 1 is a norm among most BEM tools when schedule is missing, then this behavior I believe should be part of the RPD test for HVAC, since RCT is expecting a schedule id in terminal data group as well as an 8760 hour schedule in the Schedule data group.

@claperle
Copy link
Collaborator

@weilixu I think the assumption is that if there is no schedule defined in the RPD then the OA is not being actually modeled. I think software tools will vary widely in how they deal with a schedule not being defined. I maybe be misunderstanding your question but I think that crucial step is that the software tools writes the schedules that are actually modeled to the RPD regardless of whether the user defined them or not in the inputs.

@weilixu
Copy link
Collaborator Author

weilixu commented Jan 19, 2024

@claperle
That makes sense. Maybe it is a question to @JasonGlazer's work on createRMDscript.
Thanks for the confirmation.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants