Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Evaluate using Universal Module Definition format #202

Open
knuton opened this issue Jul 30, 2015 · 1 comment
Open

Evaluate using Universal Module Definition format #202

knuton opened this issue Jul 30, 2015 · 1 comment
Assignees
@knuton
Milestone
3.0-pre-4

Comments

@knuton
Copy link
Contributor

knuton commented Jul 30, 2015

Instead of separate packaging pipelines for AMD and CommonJS, if we were to produce UMD we might have less complexity in both Spaghetti core and in using Spaghetti.
@knuton knuton self-assigned this Jul 30, 2015
@lptr
Copy link
Contributor

lptr commented Jul 30, 2015

I remember looking at this a while ago, but it was not really in a usable state. Would be nice if it was now.

Also, what would really open up Spaghetti to general use is if we could package things as NPM. Might be worth looking into at the same time as this.

@knuton knuton added this to the 3.0-rc1 milestone Jan 14, 2016
@knuton knuton modified the milestones: 3.0-pre-1, 3.0-pre-2 Jan 28, 2016
@knuton knuton modified the milestones: 3.0-pre-2, 3.0-pre-3 Mar 10, 2016
@knuton knuton modified the milestones: 3.0-pre-3, 3.0-pre-4 May 2, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@knuton knuton

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
3.0-pre-4
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@knuton @lptr