You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Dates are currently assigned to _ssm fields, which store them as plain strings. This results in gaps in search, where e.g. 2012 does not match a record with a date range of 2005-2015 - in fact, they fail the AND query and will not return matches (e.g. jabara 1959 returns 0 results on the demo site).
Would it be possible/reasonable to take advantage of Solr's DateTimeField, which would allow for more sophisticated date handling?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Dates are currently assigned to
_ssm
fields, which store them as plain strings. This results in gaps in search, where e.g.2012
does not match a record with a date range of2005-2015
- in fact, they fail the AND query and will not return matches (e.g.jabara 1959
returns 0 results on the demo site).Would it be possible/reasonable to take advantage of Solr's DateTimeField, which would allow for more sophisticated date handling?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: