Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Implement more syscalls #175

Open
HotelCalifornia opened this issue Sep 22, 2019 · 0 comments
Open

Implement more syscalls #175

HotelCalifornia opened this issue Sep 22, 2019 · 0 comments
Labels
enhancement This builds on top of an existing feature p: low Low priority

Comments

@HotelCalifornia
Copy link
Contributor

HotelCalifornia commented Sep 22, 2019

Expected Behavior:

Standard function calls like remove should probably work.

Actual Behavior:

Calling remove for example will trigger a linker error because we don't have an implementation of _link.

Additional Information

Figure out what missing syscalls we should implement.

Screenshots/Output Dumps/Stack Traces

@HotelCalifornia HotelCalifornia added p: high High priority enhancement This builds on top of an existing feature labels Sep 22, 2019
@HotelCalifornia HotelCalifornia added this to the 3.2.1 milestone Sep 22, 2019
@HotelCalifornia HotelCalifornia added this to Backlog in PROS Non-Versioned Kernel Development via automation Sep 22, 2019
@HotelCalifornia HotelCalifornia removed this from the 3.2.1 milestone Jan 21, 2020
@WillXuCodes WillXuCodes moved this from Backlog to In Progress in PROS Non-Versioned Kernel Development Aug 3, 2022
@WillXuCodes WillXuCodes moved this from In Progress to To-Do in PROS Non-Versioned Kernel Development Aug 3, 2022
@WillXuCodes WillXuCodes added p: low Low priority and removed p: high High priority labels Dec 13, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement This builds on top of an existing feature p: low Low priority
Projects
No open projects
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants