Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Multiple Mediation Order #179

Open
prankard opened this issue Sep 20, 2015 · 1 comment
Open

Multiple Mediation Order #179

prankard opened this issue Sep 20, 2015 · 1 comment

Comments

@prankard
Copy link

So I've been doing a lot of multiple mediation recently (which is really cool). Just tagging a whole lot of view objects with interfaces to give it lots of new functionality/abilities.

But when doing so a lot, I've had a couple of cases where mediators need to run a particular order.

You've made a cool initialize and destroy order.

preInitialize
initialize
postInitialize
preDestroy
destroy
postDestroy

But when mediating a view with 2 mediators. The order isn't what I expected to happen. I wanted to make sure code was run a particular mediator before another one.

Here is the current order:

Mediator A - preInitialize
Mediator A - initialize
Mediator A - postInitialize
Mediator B - preInitialize
Mediator B - initialize
Mediator B - postInitialize
Mediator A - preDestroy
Mediator A - destroy
Mediator A - postDestroy
Mediator B - preDestroy
Mediator B - destroy
Mediator B - postDestroy

Can I change it like so:

Mediator A - preInitialize
Mediator B - preInitialize
Mediator A - initialize
Mediator B - initialize
Mediator A - postInitialize
Mediator B - postInitialize
Mediator A - preDestroy
Mediator B - preDestroy
Mediator A - destroy
Mediator B - destroy
Mediator A - postDestroy
Mediator B - postDestroy

I'm working on the code now, but wanted to make sure there wasn't a reason for the previous method.

@ivan-shaban
Copy link

Hi, how about implement that behaviour like a toggled feature (e.g. in mediator map)? I think in some cases first behaviour a useful, and in other the second?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants