Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Host State Machine Add-In's code somewhere #77

Open
gavanderhoorn opened this issue Feb 7, 2020 · 6 comments
Open

Host State Machine Add-In's code somewhere #77

gavanderhoorn opened this issue Feb 7, 2020 · 6 comments
Labels

Comments

@gavanderhoorn
Copy link
Member

Tracking this here, even though it's not really the place.

@jontje wrote (in #73 (comment)):

The RAPID modules are currently only available in the distribution format, i.e. packaged into v1.0 and v1.1. But, yes, it would be nice to make the RAPID modules available directly as well.

@traversaro
Copy link
Contributor

fyi @AlbertoRemusIIT

@jontje jontje changed the title Host State Machine addin somewhere Host State Machine Add-In's code somewhere Feb 10, 2020
@jontje
Copy link
Contributor

jontje commented Feb 10, 2020

@gavanderhoorn, I updated the title just for clarification, since the StateMachine Add-In is already hosted at the ABB RobotApps site (in distribution format).

@gavanderhoorn
Copy link
Member Author

Just to be clear: we'd be hosting the addin itself and the accompanying RAPID code (templates), correct?

@jontje
Copy link
Contributor

jontje commented Feb 17, 2020

Just to be clear: we'd be hosting the addin itself and the accompanying RAPID code (templates), correct?

All the Add-In’s insides could be hosted, but I don’t see much sense in including the packaged format (that is generated from the “Add-In Packaging Tool 1.9” found here). And with insides I mean the RAPID code, system configurations and installation script.

@gavanderhoorn
Copy link
Member Author

@jontje: any update here?

@jontje
Copy link
Contributor

jontje commented Mar 24, 2020

@jontje: any update here?

Not as of yet, and I don't have an estimate of when I could work on this.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants