Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Docs]: How does this compare to eslint [features/ rules]? #101

Open
GiriB opened this issue May 10, 2021 · 1 comment
Open

[Docs]: How does this compare to eslint [features/ rules]? #101

GiriB opened this issue May 10, 2021 · 1 comment
Labels
C-documentation Category: documentation

Comments

@GiriB
Copy link

GiriB commented May 10, 2021

Hey! This is pretty cool project! I was wondering how does it compare to eslint in terms of features, rules, runtimes etc?

I was trying to figure out if there is any way I can contribute and if there is roadmap of things that can be crowdsourced (like adding rules etc) I'd be happy to help!

@Stupremee
Copy link
Member

The project is currently really inactive because @RDambrosio016 is really busy at the moment and does not have time to work on it. Right now, only a small subset of ESLint rules are implemented, because RSLint does not have any way of doing analysis on variables, scopes, etc, which is required for many rules. All the rules that are available right now, can be done only by looking at the syntax of a JavaScript / TypeScript file.

As soon as we have scope analysis and probably some more stuff that is required, we will start adding all the other rules, which you can help with. I can ping you once that time has come.

Compared to ESLint, RSLint ist so much faster, but lacks configuration, available rules, editor support, and some other stuff.

@Stupremee Stupremee added the C-documentation Category: documentation label May 11, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
C-documentation Category: documentation
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants