Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

An in-range update of swagger-ui-express is breaking the build 🚨 #152

Open
greenkeeper bot opened this issue May 14, 2019 · 10 comments
Open

An in-range update of swagger-ui-express is breaking the build 🚨 #152

greenkeeper bot opened this issue May 14, 2019 · 10 comments

Comments

@greenkeeper
Copy link

greenkeeper bot commented May 14, 2019

The dependency swagger-ui-express was updated from 4.0.2 to 4.0.3.

🚨 View failing branch.

This version is covered by your current version range and after updating it in your project the build failed.

swagger-ui-express is a direct dependency of this project, and it is very likely causing it to break. If other packages depend on yours, this update is probably also breaking those in turn.

Status Details
  • continuous-integration/travis-ci/push: The Travis CI build passed (Details).
  • continuous-integration/appveyor/branch: AppVeyor build failed (Details).

Commits

The new version differs by 7 commits.

  • 546e2e9 added ability to grab css from file
  • f8b6fb3 Correct files to include
  • 7d6c301 Use tpl files to not confuse with js and html files
  • 80030ff Merge pull request #108 from nitrocode/patch-1
  • f553901 readme: rm unused swagger.json from url example
  • 4cf4630 Merge pull request #107 from ffflorian/docs/readme-testing
  • b8d5d2b docs: Fix list in readme/testing

See the full diff

FAQ and help

There is a collection of frequently asked questions. If those don’t help, you can always ask the humans behind Greenkeeper.


Your Greenkeeper Bot 🌴

@greenkeeper
Copy link
Author

greenkeeper bot commented May 14, 2019

After pinning to 4.0.2 your tests are still failing. The reported issue might not affect your project. These imprecisions are caused by inconsistent test results.

@greenkeeper
Copy link
Author

greenkeeper bot commented May 19, 2019

Your tests are still failing with this version. Compare changes

Commits

The new version differs by commits.

See the full diff

@greenkeeper
Copy link
Author

greenkeeper bot commented May 27, 2019

Your tests are still failing with this version. Compare changes

Commits

The new version differs by 6 commits.

  • 33ede77 Bump version after changes to recommended why to load urls
  • 6ddf595 Merge pull request #127 from vabhishek-me/doc-update
  • 011c6eb added the explorer option with value 'true'
  • 6138b32 Updated readme to use swaggerOptions for url and urls
  • 512b50c Updated doc for swaggerUrls
  • 5fe1f39 Put css in the correct location

See the full diff

@greenkeeper
Copy link
Author

greenkeeper bot commented Jun 5, 2019

Your tests are still failing with this version. Compare changes

Commits

The new version differs by 6 commits.

See the full diff

@greenkeeper
Copy link
Author

greenkeeper bot commented Jul 2, 2019

Your tests are still failing with this version. Compare changes

Commits

The new version differs by 3 commits.

See the full diff

@greenkeeper
Copy link
Author

greenkeeper bot commented Sep 11, 2019

Your tests are still failing with this version. Compare changes

Commits

The new version differs by 10 commits.

  • ec109c8 bump version
  • d10791b Req object is not defined until inside the middleware
  • 3b3aee5 Merge pull request #142 from johndcarmichael/master
  • ebc2fa8 Fix: moved the html genetate out of the middleware function, got rid of another sync function, tidy up readme file
  • d2c8d5d fix: make the generateHTML not use node sync functions, update the readme, remove dead code and format the index to js standard from a mixed style
  • cec44d6 fix: check the req object for the swaggerDoc, if not there run original code which returned a cached variable
  • 5960ef1 fix: typo in readme file
  • dfb41b8 feat: load the swagger file from the req. object
  • 6711c8e Merge pull request #141 from muraliprajapati/patch-1
  • 133188c Fixed path from "/" to "/api-docs" for express router

See the full diff

@greenkeeper
Copy link
Author

greenkeeper bot commented Sep 17, 2019

Your tests are still failing with this version. Compare changes

Commits

The new version differs by 4 commits.

  • 5a8dc27 Bump version
  • 92dd18c Merge pull request #144 from antonve/master
  • b950696 fix: correct typo in readme on how to dynamically change the hostname
  • 39ec67b fix: use request's swaggerDoc when available

See the full diff

@greenkeeper
Copy link
Author

greenkeeper bot commented Oct 5, 2019

Your tests are still failing with this version. Compare changes

Commits

The new version differs by 4 commits.

  • 5132d58 Remove fs as not longer needed
  • 492b68e Merge pull request #148 from johndcarmichael/master
  • 0beaf74 feat: optimise, add the html and js strings to the index directly
  • 94a66a7 feat: require the tpl files from js modules enabling a flat packed single webpack file inc. all node mods

See the full diff

@greenkeeper
Copy link
Author

greenkeeper bot commented Jan 20, 2020

Your tests are still failing with this version. Compare changes

Commits

The new version differs by 9 commits.

  • 98f40f8 Bump version
  • 669b881 Merge pull request #153 from ffflorian/fix/typo
  • 9d8267b fix: Typo in customSiteTitle
  • daf1305 Merge pull request #150 from marcobiedermann/hotfix/middlware
  • 6dc9e6f fix: name middleware
  • 0c422ed Relax npm express peer dependency, also inslude in dev dependencies for testing
  • 8c91c10 Merge pull request #146 from RDeluxe/master
  • a2f78e1 :package: Mode express to peerDependencies
  • 8ea7c98 :package: Express now a dependency and not a devDependecy

See the full diff

@greenkeeper
Copy link
Author

greenkeeper bot commented Mar 21, 2020

Your tests are still failing with this version. Compare changes

Commits

The new version differs by 1 commits.

  • da6d0e2 Stop leaking Package.json

See the full diff

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

0 participants