New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Standardize tag syntax #619
Comments
+1 Since graphite now supports tags(http://graphite.readthedocs.io/en/latest/tags.html), it is quite the time to do so. |
Note SignalFX picked yet a different syntax including both brackets and commas. "Jane, stop this crazy thing!" |
Hey thanks for bumping this, the project is sort of back to life now (mostly just me). I'd be keen to explore this, but one of the good things about statsd is that the bucket names are very flexible and can be used in a myriad of ways. If someone has an idea of a proposal with some reasons as to why we might choose to push a standard, I'd be up for discussing it. A PR of a markdown document into |
Any updates on this? |
@yifeikong as I mentioned in my previous comment, if someone wants to put together a proposal I'd be happy to review and add my thoughts. Until that happens, I don't see much progress being made here. Right now I don't have any specific feelings a direction we standardise with, and if we did choose to do so we'd be looking at a potentially breaking change which isn't ideal. As mentioned previously, if someone has ideas they'd like to share then a PR with a draft document would be a great place to start. |
InfluxDB and Datadog both extended the statsd format to include tags, but each did so with their own special separator syntax (comma
,
vs. colon:
).Could the official statsd fork come back to live and promote a standard tagging syntax?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: