-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 55
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
@property #402
Comments
Note to TAG colleagues: provisionally assigning to the same folks as #318 during triage. Please feel free to un-assign yourself. :) |
We just filed two issues; since it's not 100% clear what direction the spec was intending to go on those issues (especially 942) it would be useful to get responses to those before reviewing further (although it might be, depending on the response, that we don't have further comments). |
We (me @alice @hober @plinss) are looking at this in Cupertino. We're happy with the responses to those two filed issues. One thing @plinss was curious about is, given that all the Our understanding is that the current model is that So at this point I think we're happy to close this issue. |
Thank you for the review. :-)
I don't think anything prevents us from adding that in the future if we need it.
That's correct, but note that the same actually applies to |
Aside from general developer ergonomics I don't see a need for that API just yet. The question came up in the context of wondering if such an API would include |
こんにちはTAG!
I'm requesting a TAG review of:
@property
(part of CSS Properties and Values API Level 1, CSS Properties and Values API Level 1 #318)[css-properties-values-api]
prefix in the title of issues.Further details:
We'd prefer the TAG provide feedback as (please select one):
Description:
The
@property
rule is briefly put a way to register a custom property in pure CSS.For example, the two pieces of code (JS and CSS respectively) are equivalent, and result in exactly the same property registration:
Authors often just want make a custom property animatable, and having to resort to JS just for this is not always desirable or possible (e.g. JS may be disabled).
See also the amount of exceitement on the original proposal (reactions at the bottom of the first post).
Notable resolved issues:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: