You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Describe the bug
I am working on ESMF/NUOPC interface for WRF to couple with regional ocean model (NEMO). At this point, I am in a stage to testing the development with data ocean component but this creates an issue since I am using generic data component called CDEPS. WRF has some shared code copied from CESM like shr_orb_mod under phys/module_sf_clm.F and this conflicts with CDEPS ones. At this point, I am plaining to change the module names used under WRF to make them more specialized since they are belong to 2007 (I think) and the ones provided by the CDEPS are more up-to-date. Anyway, I just want to hear your feeling about it. My ultimate goal is to create PR once I have fully functional ESMF/NUOPC "cap" and tested under CESM framework.
To Reproduce
There is no strait forward way to reproduce this issue.
Expected behavior
Namespace conflict and build fails for coupled application.
Screenshots
N/A
Attachments
N/A
Additional context
N/A
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@dudhia That is totally fine. Okay. I just want to get your opinion/suggestions. Anyway, I'll go ahead and fix the issue in the WRF source code. I think I could handle other issues without help. Best.
Describe the bug
I am working on ESMF/NUOPC interface for WRF to couple with regional ocean model (NEMO). At this point, I am in a stage to testing the development with data ocean component but this creates an issue since I am using generic data component called CDEPS. WRF has some shared code copied from CESM like
shr_orb_mod
underphys/module_sf_clm.F
and this conflicts with CDEPS ones. At this point, I am plaining to change the module names used under WRF to make them more specialized since they are belong to 2007 (I think) and the ones provided by the CDEPS are more up-to-date. Anyway, I just want to hear your feeling about it. My ultimate goal is to create PR once I have fully functional ESMF/NUOPC "cap" and tested under CESM framework.To Reproduce
There is no strait forward way to reproduce this issue.
Expected behavior
Namespace conflict and build fails for coupled application.
Screenshots
N/A
Attachments
N/A
Additional context
N/A
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: