Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Image 组件中 toolbarRender 的 info 参数里面的 actions,现在只暴露出了 onZoomOut 和 onZoomIn,期望能有一个 重置action #48922

Closed
zhubincode opened this issue May 14, 2024 · 2 comments · Fixed by #48936
Assignees
Labels
help wanted The suggestion or request has been accepted, we need you to help us by sending a pull request. unconfirmed

Comments

@zhubincode
Copy link

What problem does this feature solve?

图片放大或者缩小之后可以通过一个按钮点击达到初始化的预览效果

What does the proposed API look like?

和 onZoomOut 同级,多暴露出一个方法 比如 onReset,或者onZoomOut 添加参数可以达到自定义缩小多少倍

@afc163 afc163 added the help wanted The suggestion or request has been accepted, we need you to help us by sending a pull request. label May 14, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

Hello @zhubincode. We totally like your proposal/feedback, welcome to send us a Pull Request for it. Please send your Pull Request to proper branch (feature branch for the new feature, master for bugfix and other changes), fill the Pull Request Template here, provide changelog/TypeScript/documentation/test cases if needed and make sure CI passed, we will review it soon. We appreciate your effort in advance and looking forward to your contribution!

你好 @zhubincode,我们完全同意你的提议/反馈,欢迎直接在此仓库 创建一个 Pull Request 来解决这个问题。请将 Pull Request 发到正确的分支(新特性发到 feature 分支,其他发到 master 分支),务必填写 Pull Request 内的预设模板,提供改动所需相应的 changelog、TypeScript 定义、测试用例、文档等,并确保 CI 通过,我们会尽快进行 Review,提前感谢和期待您的贡献。

giphy

@kiner-tang
Copy link
Member

这个问题有同学跟进吗?没有的话我来跟进一下

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
help wanted The suggestion or request has been accepted, we need you to help us by sending a pull request. unconfirmed
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants