Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

A copy of this list with number of stars/forks/issues provided #1931

Closed
kaxap opened this issue May 10, 2018 · 23 comments
Closed

A copy of this list with number of stars/forks/issues provided #1931

kaxap opened this issue May 10, 2018 · 23 comments

Comments

@kaxap
Copy link

kaxap commented May 10, 2018

Issuehunt badges

Hi, I made a script to scrape this awesome list and augment each repository item with its stats, namely number of stars, forks and open issues.

Here is the link to augmented README.md.

I do agree with the comments in the previous discussions that number of stars/forks do not indicate the quality or usefulness of repos very well. Number of open issues on the other hand can tell a lot.

Anyways, it helped me to navigate through the list.


IssueHunt Summary

Backers (Total: $20.00)

Become a backer now!

Or submit a pull request to get the deposits!

Tips

@kamilsk
Copy link
Contributor

kamilsk commented May 11, 2018

@kaxap
Copy link
Author

kaxap commented May 12, 2018

@kamilsk Thanks!

Added last update as well.

@matrixik
Copy link
Contributor

matrixik commented Jul 9, 2018

I would prefer to see this next to main README and no added to it. There could be link to it on top of README.

@avelino
Copy link
Owner

avelino commented Jul 9, 2018

I would prefer to see this on site (awesome-go.com) not on README, build site on:

  • merged on master (as it is today)
  • automatic 0am (crontab by example)

On README polluted (visually)

@dmitshur dmitshur removed their assignment Oct 4, 2018
@Ma124
Copy link

Ma124 commented Jan 22, 2019

I created something similar which is already integrated with the old build system: commit diff

But if you start the docker container now you need to provide the -e GH_TOKEN=<ghtoken> where <ghtoken> is generated here.
You need the token because of the GitHub API Ratelimiting.

It looks like this right now but of course we can change the CSS:
A compiled version on my page
preview

@Ma124
Copy link

Ma124 commented Jan 23, 2019

@avelino @kaxap What do you think about this?

@kaxap
Copy link
Author

kaxap commented Jan 23, 2019

@Ma124 I think it's a great idea! Personally, I had issues with the markdown's layout since I had added too many new columns. In this case I am sure @avelino can check your CSS modifications as well.

@Ma124
Copy link

Ma124 commented Jan 24, 2019

@kaxap I'm planning on making the tables sortable, adding octicons after the numbers in the columns (star, fork etc) and to provide a button to hide individual columns

@Ma124
Copy link

Ma124 commented Jan 26, 2019

@avelino @kaxap
image

I added sorting and icons

Is this better?

@kaxap
Copy link
Author

kaxap commented Feb 2, 2019

@Ma124 yeah, definitely. Looks redundant on a short table but long table absolutely needs this, imho.

@IssueHuntBot
Copy link

@rororofff has funded $20.00 to this issue.


@Ma124
Copy link

Ma124 commented Mar 26, 2019

@rororofff I'm still working on it. I've made Awesome Framework

@Ma124
Copy link

Ma124 commented Mar 26, 2019

#2445

@avelino
Copy link
Owner

avelino commented Mar 26, 2019

#2445

That way we don't have indexing on Google, read more: #983

@Ma124
Copy link

Ma124 commented Mar 27, 2019

Why that? Isn't the result on awesome-go.com the same?

@avelino
Copy link
Owner

avelino commented Mar 27, 2019

Why that? Isn't the result on awesome-go.com the same?

People usually search for some library Go on Google, have the content in render (HTML) makes Google find the awesome-go.com

@Ma124
Copy link

Ma124 commented Mar 27, 2019

I'm really sorry but I still don't get it. How could you solve that?

@Ma124
Copy link

Ma124 commented Apr 18, 2019

@avelino
I've read #983 several times now and the only SEO requirement you describe is that the file is put in the gh-pages branch and my pull request does that: https://github.com/Ma124/awesome-go-fork/tree/gh-pages .

Sorry if I'm annoying but I'm still not sure what the problem is so I can't fix it.

@Ma124
Copy link

Ma124 commented Apr 20, 2020

@avelino I wanted to re-ping this issue as the changes still would be useful, and could help with a lot of the other open issues.

Worth mentioning is that my proposal does render everything to a static file on gh-pages and therefore should not impact SEO ratings.
The sorting is done on the client-side instead. The program pulls the statistics, if triggered manually on Travis CI or automatically on every commit, and writes them to the static HTML file. These processes are handled by the Awesome-Framework which has an A+ Go Report Card (Go Report Card) and a high unit test coverage (CodeCov)

You can try it out on my site.

These changes would help with #1446 and #2649 because you could, for example, sort by decreasing time since the last commit and find the projects that aren't maintained anymore more comfortably. It would also be trivial to add links to the GoReportCard and GoDoc.

The extraction of information from the markdown document could aid with #1548, too.

@avelino
Copy link
Owner

avelino commented Jul 13, 2020

Hey @Ma124, this being in html rendering I find valid (as discussed here #3163 #3154 (comment), but not in the readme/github render), can you assume this implementation along with this issue?

@Ma124
Copy link

Ma124 commented Jul 13, 2020

@avelino yes, I'd be very happy to do so.

@UnrestrictedAccess

This comment was marked as off-topic.

@Liliana36

This comment was marked as spam.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment