-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
/
Sacred Books of the East Vol. 8_ The Bhagavad-Gîtâ_ Bhagavadgîtâ_ Introduction to Bhagavadgîtâ.mhtml
2188 lines (2181 loc) · 145 KB
/
Sacred Books of the East Vol. 8_ The Bhagavad-Gîtâ_ Bhagavadgîtâ_ Introduction to Bhagavadgîtâ.mhtml
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
945
946
947
948
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
956
957
958
959
960
961
962
963
964
965
966
967
968
969
970
971
972
973
974
975
976
977
978
979
980
981
982
983
984
985
986
987
988
989
990
991
992
993
994
995
996
997
998
999
1000
From: <Saved by Blink>
Snapshot-Content-Location: http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/sbe08/sbe0802.htm
Subject: =?utf-8?Q?Sacred=20Books=20of=20the=20East=20Vol.=208:=20The=20Bhagavad-G?=
=?utf-8?Q?=C3=AEt=C3=A2:=20Bhagavadg=C3=AEt=C3=A2:=20Introduction=20to=20?=
=?utf-8?Q?Bhagavadg=C3=AEt=C3=A2?=
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2019 13:42:09 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/related;
type="text/html";
boundary="----MultipartBoundary--PrZp2UqYezOzuqoa2egdREU2kLIjt5gxR3MPbk4fPl----"
------MultipartBoundary--PrZp2UqYezOzuqoa2egdREU2kLIjt5gxR3MPbk4fPl----
Content-Type: text/html
Content-ID: <frame-C90EB43EA1C693B9DBCA787D1FAE9F33@mhtml.blink>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Location: http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/sbe08/sbe0802.htm
<html><style type=3D"text/css" id=3D"dark-mode-custom-style"></style><head>=
<meta http-equiv=3D"Content-Type" content=3D"text/html; charset=3Dwindows-1=
252">
<meta name=3D"description" content=3D"Sacred Books of the East Vol. 8: The =
Bhagavad-G=EEt=E2, at sacred-texts.com">
<meta name=3D"keywords" content=3D"Hinduism Gita Bhagavad-Gita Bhagavadgita=
Mahabharata">
<title>Sacred Books of the East Vol. 8: The Bhagavad-G=EEt=E2: Bhagavadg=EE=
t=E2: Introduction to Bhagavadg=EEt=E2</title>
</head>
<body>
<center>
<a href=3D"http://www.sacred-texts.com/cdshop/index.htm"><img src=3D"http:/=
/www.sacred-texts.com/cdshop/cdinfo.jpg" border=3D"0"></a><br><a href=3D"ht=
tp://www.sacred-texts.com/index.htm">Sacred Texts</a>
<a href=3D"http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/index.htm">Hinduism</a>
<a href=3D"http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/sbe08/index.htm">Index</a>
<a href=3D"http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/sbe08/sbe0801.htm">Previous</a>&=
nbsp;
<a href=3D"http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/sbe08/sbe0803.htm">Next</a> =
;
</center>
<hr>
<p></p>
<p><a name=3D"page_1"><font size=3D"1" color=3D"GREEN">p. 1</font></a></p>
<h1 align=3D"CENTER">INTRODUCTION TO BHAGAVADG=CET=C2.</h1>
<p>IT has become quite a literary commonplace, that--to borrow the words of=
Professor Max M=FCller in one of his recent lectures--history, in the ordi=
nary sense of the word, is almost unknown in Indian literature <a name=
=3D"fr_0"></a><a href=3D"http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/sbe08/sbe0802.htm#=
fn_0"><font size=3D"1">1</font></a>. And it is certainly a remarkable irony=
of fate, that we should be obliged to make this remark on the very thresho=
ld of an introduction to the Bhagavadg=EEt=E2; for according to the eminent=
French philosopher, Cousin <a name=3D"fr_1"></a><a href=3D"http://www=
.sacred-texts.com/hin/sbe08/sbe0802.htm#fn_1"><font size=3D"1">2</font></a>=
, this great deficiency in Sanskrit literature is due, in no inconsiderable=
measure, to the doctrines propounded in the Bhagavadg=EEt=E2 itself. But h=
owever that may be, this much is certain, that the student of the Bhagavadg=
=EEt=E2 must, for the present, go without that reliable historical informat=
ion touching the author of the work, the time at which it was composed, and=
even the place it occupies in literature, which one naturally desires, whe=
n entering upon the study of any work. More especially in an attempt like t=
he present, intended as it mainly is for students of the history of religio=
n, I should have been better pleased, if I could, in this Introduction, hav=
e concentrated to a focus, as it were, only those well ascertained historic=
al results, on which there is something like a consensus of opinion among p=
ersons qualified to judge. But there is no exaggeration in saying, that it =
is almost impossible to lay down even a single proposition respecting any i=
mportant matter connected with the Bhagavadg=EEt=E2, about which any such c=
onsensus can be said to exist. The conclusions arrived at in this Introduct=
ion must, therefore, be distinctly</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>
</p>
<p><a name=3D"page_2"><font size=3D"1" color=3D"GREEN">p. 2</font></a></p>
<p>understood to embody individual opinions only, and must be taken accordi=
ngly for what they are worth.</p>
<p>The full name of the work is Bhagavadg=EEt=E2. In common parlance, we of=
ten abbreviate the name into G=EEt=E2, and in Sanskrit literature the name =
occurs in both forms. In the works of Sa<u>n</u>kar=E2<i>k</i>=E2rya, quota=
tions from the G=EEt=E2 are introduced, sometimes with the words 'In the G=
=EEt=E2,' or 'In the Bhagavadg=EEt=E2,' and sometimes with words which may =
be rendered 'In the G=EEt=E2s,' the plural form being used <a name=3D"=
fr_2"></a><a href=3D"http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/sbe08/sbe0802.htm#fn_2=
"><font size=3D"1">1</font></a>. In the colophons to the MSS. of the work, =
the form current, apparently throughout India, is, 'In the Upanishads sung =
(G=EEt=E2s) by the Deity.' Sa<u>n</u>kar=E2<i>k</i>=E2rya, indeed, sometime=
s calls it the =CE<i>s</i>vara G=EEt=E2 <a name=3D"fr_3"></a><a href=
=3D"http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/sbe08/sbe0802.htm#fn_3"><font size=3D"1=
">2</font></a>, which, I believe, is the specific title of a different work=
altogether. The signification, however, of the two names is identical, nam=
ely, the song sung by the Deity, or, as Wilkins translates it, the Divine L=
ay.</p>
<p>This Divine Lay forms part of the Bh=EEshma Parvan of the Mah=E2bh=E2rat=
a--one of the two well-known national epics of India. The G=EEt=E2 gives it=
s name to a subdivision of the Bh=EEshma Parvan, which is called the Bhagav=
adg=EEt=E2 Parvan, and which includes, in addition to the eighteen chapters=
of which the G=EEt=E2 consists, twelve other chapters. Upon this the quest=
ion has naturally arisen, Is the G=EEt=E2 a genuine portion of the Mah=E2bh=
=E2rata, or is it a later addition? The question is one of considerable dif=
ficulty. But I cannot help saying, that the manner in which it has been gen=
erally dealt with is not altogether satisfactory to my mind. Before going a=
ny further into that question, however, it is desirable to state some of th=
e facts on which the decision must be based. It appears, then, that the roy=
al family of Hastin=E2pura was divided into two branches; the one called th=
e Kauravas, and the other the P=E2<i>nd</i>avas. The former wished to keep =
the latter out of the share of the kingdom claimed by them; and so, after m=
any attempts at</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>
</p>
<p><a name=3D"page_3"><font size=3D"1" color=3D"GREEN">p. 3</font></a></p>
<p>an amicable arrangement had proved fruitless, it was determined to decid=
e the differences between the two parties by the arbitrament of arms. Each =
party accordingly collected its adherents, and the hostile armies met on th=
e 'holy field of Kurukshetra,' I mentioned in the opening lines of our poem=
. At this juncture, K<i>ri</i>sh<i>n</i>a Dvaip=E2yana, alias Vy=E2sa, a re=
lative of both parties and endowed with more than human powers, presents hi=
mself before Dh<i>ri</i>tar=E2sh<i>t</i>ra, the father of the Kauravas, who=
is stated to be altogether blind. Vy=E2sa asks Dh<i>ri</i>tar=E2sh<i>t</i>=
ra whether it is his wish to look with his own eyes on the course of the ba=
ttle; and on Dh<i>ri</i>tar=E2sh<i>t</i>ra's expressing his reluctance, Vy=
=E2sa deputes one Sa=F1<i>g</i>aya to relate to Dh<i>ri</i>tar=E2sh<i>t</i>=
ra all the events of the battle, giving to Sa=F1<i>g</i>aya, by means of hi=
s own superhuman powers, all necessary aids for performing the duty. Then t=
he battle begins, and after a ten days' struggle, the first great general o=
f the Kauravas, namely Bh=EEshma, falls <a name=3D"fr_4"></a><a href=
=3D"http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/sbe08/sbe0802.htm#fn_4"><font size=3D"1=
">1</font></a>. At this point Sa=F1<i>g</i>aya comes up to Dh<i>ri</i>tar=
=E2sh<i>t</i>ra, and announces to him the sad result, which is of course a =
great blow to his party. Dh<i>ri</i>tar=E2sh<i>t</i>ra then makes numerous =
enquiries of Sa=F1<i>g</i>aya regarding the course of the conflict, all of =
which Sa=F1<i>g</i>aya duly answers. And among his earliest answers is the =
account of the conversation between K<i>ri</i>sh<i>n</i>a and Ar<i>g</i>una=
at the commencement of the battle, which constitutes the Bhagavadg=EEt=E2.=
After relating to Dh<i>ri</i>tar=E2sh<i>t</i>ra that 'wonderful and holy d=
ialogue,' and after giving an account of what occurred in the intervals of =
the conversation, Sa=F1<i>g</i>aya proceeds to narrate the actual events of=
the battle.</p>
<p>With this rough outline. of the framework of the story before us, we are=
now in a, position to consider the opposing arguments on the point above n=
oted. Mr. Talboys Wheeler writes on that point as follows <a name=3D"f=
r_5"></a><a href=3D"http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/sbe08/sbe0802.htm#fn_5"=
><font size=3D"1">2</font></a>. 'But there remains one other anomalous char=
acteristic of the history of the great war, as it is recorded in the Mah=E2=
bh=E2rata, which cannot</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>
</p>
<p><a name=3D"page_4"><font size=3D"1" color=3D"GREEN">p. 4</font></a></p>
<p>be passed over in silence; and that is the extraordinary abruptness and =
infelicity with which Brahmanical discourses, such as essays on law, on mor=
als, sermons on divine things, and even instruction in the so-called scienc=
es are recklessly grafted upon the main narrative.... K<i>ri</i>sh<i>n</i>a=
and Ar<i>g</i>una on the morning of the first day of the war, when both ar=
mies are drawn out in battle-array, and hostilities are about to begin, ent=
er into a long and philosophical dialogue respecting the various forms of d=
evotion which lead to the emancipation of the soul; and it cannot be denied=
that, however incongruous and irrelevant such a dialogue must appear on th=
e eve of battle, the discourse of K<i>ri</i>sh<i>n</i>a, whilst acting as t=
he charioteer of Ar<i>g</i>una, contains the essence of the most spiritual =
phases of Brahmanical teaching, and is expressed in language of such depth =
and sublimity, that it has become deservedly known as the Bhagavad-g=EEt=E2=
or Divine Song. . . . Indeed no effort has been spared by the Brahmanical =
compilers to convert the history of the great war into a vehicle for Brahma=
nical teaching; and so skilfully are many of these interpolations interwove=
n with the story, that it is frequently impossible to narrate the one, with=
out referring to the other, however irrelevant the matter may be to the mai=
n subject in hand.' It appears to me, I own, very difficult to accept that =
as a satisfactory argument, amounting, as it does, to no more than this--th=
at 'interpolations,' which must needs be referred to in narrating the main =
story even to make it intelligible, are nevertheless to be regarded 'as evi=
dently the product of a Brahmanical age <a name=3D"fr_6"></a><a href=
=3D"http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/sbe08/sbe0802.htm#fn_6"><font size=3D"1=
">1</font></a>,' and presumably also a later age, because, forsooth, they a=
re irrelevant and incongruous according to the 'tastes and ideas <a na=
me=3D"fr_7"></a><a href=3D"http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/sbe08/sbe0802.ht=
m#fn_6"><font size=3D"1">1</font></a>'--not of the time, be it remembered, =
when the 'main story' is supposed to have been written, but--of this enligh=
tened nineteenth century. The support, too, which may be supposed to be der=
ived by this argument from the allegation that there has been an attempt to=
Brahmanize, so to say, the</p>
<p>
</p>
<p><a name=3D"page_5"><font size=3D"1" color=3D"GREEN">p. 5</font></a></p>
<p>history of the great war, appears to me to be extremely weak, so far as =
the G=EEt=E2 is concerned. But that is a point which will have to be consid=
ered more at large in the sequel <a name=3D"fr_8"></a><a href=3D"http:=
//www.sacred-texts.com/hin/sbe08/sbe0802.htm#fn_7"><font size=3D"1">1</font=
></a>.</p>
<p>While, however, I am not prepared to admit the cogency of Mr. Wheeler's =
arguments, I am not, on the other hand, to be understood as holding that th=
e G=EEt=E2 must be accepted as a genuine part of the original Mah=E2bh=E2ra=
ta. I own that my feeling on the subject is something akin to that of the g=
reat historian of Greece regarding the Homeric question, a feeling of painf=
ul diffidence regarding the soundness of any conclusion whatever. While it =
is impossible not to feel serious doubts about the critical condition of th=
e Mah=E2bh=E2rata generally; while, indeed, we may be almost certain that t=
he work has been tampered with from time to time <a name=3D"fr_9"></a>=
<a href=3D"http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/sbe08/sbe0802.htm#fn_8"><font si=
ze=3D"1">2</font></a>; it is difficult to come to a satisfactory conclusion=
regarding any particular given section of it. And it must be remembered, a=
lso, that the alternatives for us to choose from in these cases are not onl=
y these two, that the section in question may be a genuine part of the work=
, or that it may be a later interpolation: but also this, as suggested rece=
ntly, though not for the first time, by Mr. Freeman <a name=3D"fr_10">=
</a><a href=3D"http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/sbe08/sbe0802.htm#fn_9"><fon=
t size=3D"1">3</font></a> with reference to the Homeric question, that the =
section may have been in existence at the date of the original epos, and ma=
y have been worked by the author of the epos into his own production. For t=
hat absence of dread, 'either of the law or sentiment of copyright,' which =
Mr. Freeman relies upon with regard to a primitive Greek poet, was by no me=
ans confined to the Greek people, but may be traced amongst us also. The co=
mmentator Madhus=FBdana Sarasvat=EE likens the G=EEt=E2 to those dialogues =
which occur in sundry Vedic works, particularly the Upanishads <a name=
=3D"fr_11"></a><a href=3D"http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/sbe08/sbe0802.htm=
#fn_10"><font size=3D"1">4</font></a>. Possibly--I will not use a stronger =
word--possibly the G=EEt=E2 may</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>
</p>
<p><a name=3D"page_6"><font size=3D"1" color=3D"GREEN">p. 6</font></a></p>
<p>have existed as such a dialogue before the Mah=E2bh=E2rata, and may have=
been appropriated by the author of the Mah=E2bh=E2rata to his own purposes=
<a name=3D"fr_12"></a><a href=3D"http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/sbe0=
8/sbe0802.htm#fn_11"><font size=3D"1">1</font></a>. But yet, upon the whole=
, having regard to the fact that those ideas of unity on which Mr. Wheeler =
and others set so much store are scarcely appropriate to our old literature=
; to the fact that the G=EEt=E2 fits pretty well into the setting given to =
it in the Bh=EEshma Parvan; to the fact that the feeling of Ar<i>g</i>una, =
which gives occasion to it, is not at all inconsistent, but is most consona=
nt, with poetical justice; to the fact that there is not in the G=EEt=E2, i=
n my judgment, any trace of a sectarian or 'Brahmanizing' spirit <a na=
me=3D"fr_13"></a><a href=3D"http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/sbe08/sbe0802.h=
tm#fn_12"><font size=3D"1">2</font></a>, such as Mr. Wheeler and also the l=
ate Professor Goldst=FCcker <a name=3D"fr_14"></a><a href=3D"http://ww=
w.sacred-texts.com/hin/sbe08/sbe0802.htm#fn_13"><font size=3D"1">3</font></=
a> hold to have animated the arrangers of the Mah=E2bh=E2rata; having regar=
d, I say, to all these facts, I am prepared to adhere, I will not say witho=
ut diffidence, to the theory of the genuineness of the Bhagavadg=EEt=E2 as =
a portion of the original Mah=E2bh=E2rata.</p>
<p>The next point to consider is as to the authorship of the G=EEt=E2. The =
popular notion on this subject is pretty well known. The whole of the Mah=
=E2bh=E2rata is, by our traditions, attributed to Vy=E2sa, whom we have alr=
eady noticed as a relative of the Kauravas and P=E2<i>nd</i>avas; and there=
fore the Bhagavadg=EEt=E2, also, is naturally affiliated to the same author=
. The earliest written testimony to this authorship, that I can trace, is t=
o be found in Sa<u>n</u>kar=E2<i>k</i>=E2rya's commentary on the G=EEt=E2&n=
bsp;<a name=3D"fr_15"></a><a href=3D"http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/sbe08/=
sbe0802.htm#fn_14"><font size=3D"1">4</font></a> itself and on the B<i>ri</=
i>had=E2ra<i>ny</i>akopanishad <a name=3D"fr_16"></a><a href=3D"http:/=
/www.sacred-texts.com/hin/sbe08/sbe0802.htm#fn_15"><font size=3D"1">5</font=
></a>. To a certain extent, the mention of Vy=E2sa in the body of the G=EEt=
=E2 would, from a historic standpoint, seem to militate against this tradit=
ion. But I have not seen in any of the commentaries to which I have had acc=
ess, any consideration of this point, as there is of the mention in some</p=
>
<p>
</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>
</p>
<p><a name=3D"page_7"><font size=3D"1" color=3D"GREEN">p. 7</font></a></p>
<p><font size=3D"-2" color=3D"GREEN">[paragraph continues]</font> Sm<i>ri</=
i>tis and S=FBtras of the names of those to whom those Sm<i>ri</i>tis and S=
=FBtras are respectively ascribed <a name=3D"fr_17"></a><a href=3D"htt=
p://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/sbe08/sbe0802.htm#fn_16"><font size=3D"1">1</f=
ont></a>.</p>
<p>We must now leave these preliminary questions, unluckily in a state far =
from satisfactory, and proceed to that most important topic--the date when =
the G=EEt=E2 was composed, and the position it occupies in Sanskrit literat=
ure. We have here to consider the external evidence bearing on these points=
, which is tantalizingly meagre; and the internal evidence, which is, perha=
ps, somewhat more full. And taking first the internal evidence, the various=
items falling under that head may be marshalled into four groups. Firstly,=
we have to consider the general character of the G=EEt=E2 with reference t=
o its mode of handling its subject. Secondly, there is the character of its=
style and language. Thirdly, we have to consider the nature of the versifi=
cation of the G=EEt=E2. And fourthly and lastly, we must take note of sundr=
y points of detail, such as the attitude of the G=EEt=E2 towards the Vedas =
and towards caste, its allusions to other systems of speculation, and other=
matters of the like nature. On each of these groups, in the order here sta=
ted, we now proceed to make a few observations.</p>
<p>And first about the manner in which the G=EEt=E2 deals with its subject.=
It appears to me, that the work bears on the face of it very plain marks i=
ndicating that it belongs to an age prior to the system-making age of Sansk=
rit philosophy In 1875, I wrote as follows upon this point: 'My view is, th=
at in the G=EEt=E2 and the Upanishads, the philosophical part has not been =
consistently and fully worked out. We have there the results of free though=
t, exercised on different subjects of great moment, unfettered by the exige=
ncies of any foregone conclusions, or of any fully developed theory. It is =
afterwards, it is at a later stage of philosophical progress, that system-m=
aking arises. In that stage some thinkers interpret whole works by the ligh=
t of some particular doctrines or expressions. And the result is the develo=
pment of a whole multitude of philosophical sects, following the lead of th=
ose thinkers, and all professing to draw their</p>
<p>
</p>
<p><a name=3D"page_8"><font size=3D"1" color=3D"GREEN">p. 8</font></a></p>
<p>doctrine from the G=EEt=E2 or the Upanishads, yet each differing remarka=
bly from the other <a name=3D"fr_18"></a><a href=3D"http://www.sacred-=
texts.com/hin/sbe08/sbe0802.htm#fn_17"><font size=3D"1">1</font></a>.' Sinc=
e this was written, Professor Max M=FCller's Hibbert Lectures have been pub=
lished. And I am happy to find, that as regards the Upanishads, his view co=
incides exactly with that which I have expressed in the words now quoted. P=
rofessor Max M=FCller says: 'There is not what may be called a philosophica=
l system in these Upanishads. They are in the true sense of the word guesse=
s at truth, frequently contradicting each other, yet all tending in one dir=
ection <a name=3D"fr_19"></a><a href=3D"http://www.sacred-texts.com/hi=
n/sbe08/sbe0802.htm#fn_18"><font size=3D"1">2</font></a>.' Further corrobor=
ation for the same view is also forthcoming. Professor Fitz-Edward Hall, in=
a passage which I had not noticed before, says <a name=3D"fr_20"></a>=
<a href=3D"http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/sbe08/sbe0802.htm#fn_19"><font s=
ize=3D"1">3</font></a>: 'In the Upanishads, the Bhagavadg=EEt=E2, and other=
ancient Hindu books, we encounter, in combination, the doctrines which, af=
ter having been subjected to modifications that rendered them as wholes irr=
econcileable, were distinguished, at an uncertain period, into what have fo=
r many ages been styled the S=E2<u>n</u>khya and the Ved=E2nta.' We have th=
us very weighty authority for adhering to the view already expressed on thi=
s important topic. But as Professor Weber appears to have expressed an opin=
ion <a name=3D"fr_21"></a><a href=3D"http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/s=
be08/sbe0802.htm#fn_20"><font size=3D"1">4</font></a> intended perhaps to t=
hrow some doubt on the correctness of that view, it is desirable to go a li=
ttle more into detail to fortify it by actual reference to the contents of =
the G=EEt=E2, the more especially as we can thus elucidate the true charact=
er of that work. Before doing so, however, it may be pointed out, that the =
proposition we have laid down is one, the test of which lies more in a comp=
rehensive review of the whole of the G=EEt=E2, than in the investigation of=
small details on which there is necessarily much room for difference of op=
inion.</p>
<p>And first, let us compare that indisputably systematized work, the curre=
nt Yoga-s=FBtras <a name=3D"fr_22"></a><a href=3D"http://www.sacred-te=
xts.com/hin/sbe08/sbe0802.htm#fn_21"><font size=3D"1">5</font></a>, with th=
e Bhagavadg=EEt=E2 on one</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>
</p>
<p><a name=3D"page_9"><font size=3D"1" color=3D"GREEN">p. 9</font></a></p>
<p>or two topics, where they both travel over common ground. In the G=EEt=
=E2, chapter VI, stanzas 33, 34 (<a href=3D"http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin=
/sbe08/sbe0808.htm#page_71">p. 71</a>), we have Ar<i>g</i>una putting what =
is, in substance, a question to K<i>ri</i>sh<i>n</i>a, as to how the mind, =
which is admittedly 'fickle, boisterous, strong, and obstinate,' is to be b=
rought under control--such control having been declared by K<i>ri</i>sh<i>n=
</i>a to be necessary for attaining devotion (yoga)? K<i>ri</i>sh<i>n</i>a =
answers by saying that the mind may be restrained by 'practice (abhy=E2sa) =
and indifference to worldly objects (vair=E2gya).' He then goes on to say, =
that devotion cannot be attained without self-restraint, but that one who h=
as self-restraint, and works to achieve devotion, may succeed in acquiring =
it. Here the subject drops. There is no further explanation of 'practice' o=
r 'indifference to worldly objects,' no exposition of the mode in which the=
y work, and so forth. Contrast now the Yoga-s=FBtras. The topic is there di=
scussed at the very outset of the work. As usual the author begins with 'No=
w therefore the Yoga is to be taught.' He then explains Yoga by the well-kn=
own definition 'Yoga is the restraint of the movements of the mind.' And th=
en after pointing out what the movements of the mind are, he proceeds: 'The=
ir restraint is by means of practice and indifference to worldly objects&nb=
sp;<a name=3D"fr_23"></a><a href=3D"http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/sbe08/s=
be0802.htm#fn_22"><font size=3D"1">1</font></a>,'--the very terms, be it re=
marked in passing, which are used in the Bhagavadg=EEt=E2. But having come =
thus far, the author of the S=FBtras does not drop the subject as the autho=
r of the G=EEt=E2 does. He goes on in this wise: Practice is the effort for=
keeping it steady.' 'And that becomes firmly grounded when resorted to for=
a long time, without interruption, and with correct conduct.' So far we ha=
ve a discussion of the first requisite specified, namely, practice. Pata=F1=
<i>g</i>ali then goes on to his second requisite for mental restraint. 'Ind=
ifference to worldly objects is the consciousness of having subdued desires=
&c. (Va<i>s</i>ik=E2ra sa=F1<i>g</i>=F1=E2) which belongs to one havin=
g no longing for objects visible and those which are heard of' (from <i>S</=
i>=E2stras &c., such as heaven and so forth).</p>
<p>
</p>
<p><a name=3D"page_10"><font size=3D"1" color=3D"GREEN">p. 10</font></a></p=
>
<p><font size=3D"-2" color=3D"GREEN">[paragraph continues]</font> He next p=
roceeds to distinguish another and higher species of 'indifference,' and th=
en he goes on to point out the results of that self-restraint which is to b=
e acquired in the mode he has expounded. That is one instance. Now take ano=
ther. In chapter VI, stanza 10 and following stanzas, the G=EEt=E2 sets for=
th elaborately the mode of practically achieving. the mental abstraction ca=
lled Yoga. It need not be reproduced here. The reader can readily find out =
how sundry directions are there given for the purpose specified, but withou=
t any attempt at systematizing. Contrast the Yoga-s=FBtras. In the S=E2dhan=
ap=E2da, the section treating of the acquisition of Yoga, Pata=F1<i>g</i>al=
i states in the twenty-ninth aphorism the well-known eight elements of Yoga=
. Then he subdivides these elements, and expatiates on each of them distinc=
tly, defining them, indicating the mode of acquiring them, and hinting at t=
he results which flow from them. 'That inordinate love of subdivision,' whi=
ch Dr. F. E. Hall <a name=3D"fr_24"></a><a href=3D"http://www.sacred-t=
exts.com/hin/sbe08/sbe0802.htm#fn_23"><font size=3D"1">1</font></a> has som=
ewhere attributed to the Hindus, appears plainly in these aphorisms, while =
there is not a trace of it in the corresponding passage in the Bhagavadg=EE=
t=E2. In my opinion, therefore, these comparisons strongly corroborate the =
proposition we have laid down regarding the unsystematic, or rather non-sys=
tematic, character of the work. In the one we have definition, classificati=
on, division, and subdivision. In the other we have a set of practical dire=
ctions, without any attempt to arrange them in any very scientific order. I=
n the one you have a set of technical terms with specific significations. I=
n the other no such precision is yet manifest. In one word, you have in the=
G=EEt=E2 the germs, and noteworthy germs too, of a system <a name=3D"=
fr_25"></a><a href=3D"http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/sbe08/sbe0802.htm#fn_=
24"><font size=3D"1">2</font></a>, and you have most of the raw material of=
a system, but you have no system ready-made.</p>
<p>Let us look at the matter now from a slightly different point of view. T=
here are sundry words used in the Bhagavadg=EEt=E2, the significations of w=
hich are not quite identical</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>
</p>
<p><a name=3D"page_11"><font size=3D"1" color=3D"GREEN">p. 11</font></a></p=
>
<p>throughout the work. Take, for instance, the word 'yoga,' which we have =
rendered 'devotion.' At G=EEt=E2, chapter II, stanza 48 (<a href=3D"http://=
www.sacred-texts.com/hin/sbe08/sbe0804.htm#page_49">p. 49</a>), a definitio=
n is given of that word. In chapter VI, the signification it bears is entir=
ely different. And again in chapter IX, stanza 5, there is still another se=
nse in which the word is used <a name=3D"fr_26"></a><a href=3D"http://=
www.sacred-texts.com/hin/sbe08/sbe0802.htm#fn_25"><font size=3D"1">1</font>=
</a>. The word 'Brahman' too occurs in widely varying significations. And o=
ne of its meanings, indeed, is quite singular, namely, 'Nature' (see chapte=
r XIV, stanza 3). Similar observations, to a greater or less extent, apply =
to the words Buddhi, =C2tman, and Svabh=E2va <a name=3D"fr_27"></a><a =
href=3D"http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/sbe08/sbe0802.htm#fn_26"><font size=
=3D"1">2</font></a>. Now these are words which stand for ideas not unimport=
ant in the philosophy of the Bhagavadg=EEt=E2. And the absence of scientifi=
c precision about their use appears to me to be some indication of that non=
-systematic character of which we have already spoken.</p>
<p>There is one other line of argument, which leads, I think, to the same c=
onclusion. There are several passages in the G=EEt=E2 which it is not very =
easy to reconcile with one another; and no attempt is made to harmonise the=
m. Thus, for example, in stanza 16 of chapter VII, K<i>ri</i>sh<i>n</i>a di=
vides his devotees into four classes, one of which consists of 'men of know=
ledge,' whom, K<i>ri</i>sh<i>n</i>a says, he considers 'as his own self.' I=
t would probably be difficult to imagine any expression which could indicat=
e higher esteem. Yet in stanza 46 of chapter VI, we have it laid down, that=
the devotee is superior not only to the mere performer of penances, but ev=
en to the men of knowledge. The commentators betray their gnostic bias by i=
nterpreting 'men of knowledge' in this latter passage to mean those who hav=
e acquired erudition in the <i>S</i>=E2stras and their significations. This=
is not an interpretation to be necessarily rejected. But there is in it a =
certain twisting of words, which, under the circumstances here, I am not in=
clined to accept. And on the other hand, it must not be forgotten, that the=
implication fairly derivable from chapter IV, stanza 38 (pp. <a href=3D"ht=
tp://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/sbe08/sbe0806.htm#page_62">62</a>, <a href=3D=
"http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/sbe08/sbe0806.htm#page_63">63</a>), would =
seem to</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>
</p>
<p><a name=3D"page_12"><font size=3D"1" color=3D"GREEN">p. 12</font></a></p=
>
<p>be rather that knowledge is superior to devotion--is the higher stage to=
be reached by means of devotion as the stepping-stone. In another passage =
again at G=EEt=E2, chapter XII, stanza 12, concentration is preferred to kn=
owledge, which also seems to me to be irreconcileable with chapter VII, sta=
nza 16. Take still another instance. At G=EEt=E2, chapter V, stanza 15, it =
is said, that 'the Lord receives the sin or merit of none.' Yet at chapter =
V, stanza 29, and again at chapter IX, stanza 24, K<i>ri</i>sh<i>n</i>a cal=
ls himself 'the Lord and enjoyer' of all sacrifices and penances. How, it m=
ay well be asked, can the Supreme Being 'enjoy' that which he does not even=
receive?' Once more, at chapter X, stanza 29, K<i>ri</i>sh<i>n</i>a declar=
es that 'none is hateful to me, none dear.' And yet the remarkable verses a=
t the close of chapter XII seem to stand in point-blank contradiction to th=
at declaration. There through a most elaborate series of stanzas, the burde=
n of K<i>ri</i>sh<i>n</i>a's eloquent sermon is 'such a one is dear to me.'=
And again in those fine verses, where K<i>ri</i>sh<i>n</i>a winds up his D=
ivine Lay, he similarly tells Ar<i>g</i>una, that he, Ar<i>g</i>una, is 'de=
ar' to K<i>ri</i>sh<i>n</i>a. And K<i>ri</i>sh<i>n</i>a also speaks of that=
devotee as 'dear' to him, who may publish the Mystery of the G=EEt=E2 amon=
g those who reverence the Supreme Being <a name=3D"fr_28"></a><a href=
=3D"http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/sbe08/sbe0802.htm#fn_27"><font size=3D"=
1">1</font></a>. And yet again, how are we to reconcile the same passage ab=
out none being 'hateful or dear' to K<i>ri</i>sh<i>n</i>a, with his own wor=
ds at chapter XVI, stanza 18 and following stanzas? The language used in de=
scribing the 'demoniac' people there mentioned is not remarkable for sweetn=
ess towards them, while K<i>ri</i>sh<i>n</i>a says positively, 'I hurl down=
such people into demoniac wombs, whereby they go down into misery and the =
vilest condition.' These persons are scarcely characterised with accuracy '=
as neither hateful nor dear' to K<i>ri</i>sh<i>n</i>a. It seems to me, that=
all these are real inconsistencies in the G=EEt=E2, not such, perhaps, as =
might not be explained away, but such, I think, as indicate a mind making g=
uesses at truth., as Professor Max M=FCller puts it, rather than a mind ela=
borating a complete</p>
<p>
</p>
<p><a name=3D"page_13"><font size=3D"1" color=3D"GREEN">p. 13</font></a></p=
>
<p>and organised system of philosophy. There is not even a trace of conscio=
usness on the part of the author that these inconsistencies exist. And the =
contexts of the various passages indicate, in my judgment, that a half-trut=
h is struck out here, and another half-truth there, with special reference =
to the special subject then under discussion; but no attempt is made to org=
anise the various half-truths, which are apparently incompatible, into a sy=
mmetrical whole, where the apparent inconsistencies might possibly vanish a=
ltogether in the higher synthesis. And having regard to these various point=
s, and to the further point, that the sequence of ideas throughout the vers=
es of the G=EEt=E2 is not always easily followed, we are, I think, safe in =
adhering to the opinion expressed above, that the G=EEt=E2 is a nonsystemat=
ic work, and in that respect belongs to the same class as the older Upanish=
ads.</p>
<p>We next come to the consideration of the style and language of the Bhaga=
vadg=EEt=E2. And that, I think, furnishes a strong argument for the proposi=
tion, that it belongs to an age considerably prior to the epoch of the arti=
ficial department of Sanskrit literature--the epoch, namely, of the dramas =
and poems. In its general character, the style impresses me as quite archai=
c in its simplicity. Compounds, properly so called, are not numerous; such =
as there are, are not long ones, and very rarely, if ever, present any puzz=
le in analysing. The contrast there presented with what is called the class=
ical literature, as represented by B=E2na or Da<i>nd</i>in, or even K=E2lid=
=E2sa, is not a little striking. In K=E2lid=E2sa, doubtless, the love for c=
ompounds is pretty well subdued, though I think his works have a perceptibl=
y larger proportion of them than the G=EEt=E2. But after K=E2lid=E2sa the l=
ove for compounds goes through a remarkable development, till in later writ=
ings it may be said almost to have gone mad. Even in B=E2na and Da<i>nd</i>=
in, Subandhu and Bhavabh=FBti, the plethora of compounds is often wearisome=
. And the same remark applies to many of the copperplate and other inscript=
ions which have been recently deciphered, and some of which date from the e=
arly centuries</p>
<p><a name=3D"page_14"><font size=3D"1" color=3D"GREEN">p. 14</font></a></p=
>
<p>of the Christian era. Take again the exuberance of figures and tropes wh=
ich is so marked in the classical style. There is little or nothing of that=
in the G=EEt=E2, where you have a plain and direct style of natural simpli=
city, and yet a style not by any means devoid of =E6sthetic merit like the =
style of the S=FBtra literature. There is also an almost complete absence o=
f involved syntactical constructions; no attempt to secure that jingle of l=
ike sounds, which 'seems to have proved a temptation too strong even for K=
=E2lid=E2sa's muse entirely to resist. But on the contrary, we have those r=
epetitions of words and phrases, which are characteristic, and not only in =
Sanskrit, of the style of an archaic period <a name=3D"fr_29"></a><a h=
ref=3D"http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/sbe08/sbe0802.htm#fn_28"><font size=
=3D"1">1</font></a>. Adverting specially to the language as distinguished f=
rom the style of the G=EEt=E2, we find such words as Anta, Bh=E2sh=E2, Brah=
man, some of which are collected in the Sanskrit Index in this volume, whic=
h have gone out of use in the classical literature in the significations th=
ey respectively bear in the G=EEt=E2. The word 'ha,' which occurs once, is =
worthy of special note. It is the equivalent of 'gha,' which occurs in the =
Vedic Sa<i>m</i>hit=E2s. In the form 'ha' it occurs in the Br=E2hma<i>n</i>=
as. But it never occurs, I think, in what is properly called the classical =
literature. It is, indeed, found in the Pur=E2<i>n</i>as. But that is a cla=
ss of works which occupies a very unique position. There is a good deal in =
the Pur=E2nas that, I think, must be admitted to be very ancient <a na=
me=3D"fr_30"></a><a href=3D"http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/sbe08/sbe0802.h=
tm#fn_29"><font size=3D"1">2</font></a>; while undoubtedly also there is a =
great deal in them that is very modern. It is, therefore, impossible to tre=
at the use of 'ha' in that class of works as negativing an inference of the=
antiquity of any book where the word occurs; while its use in Vedic works =
and its total absence from modern works indicate such antiquity pretty stro=
ngly. We may, therefore, embody the result of this part of the discussion i=
n the proposition, that</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>
</p>
<p><a name=3D"page_15"><font size=3D"1" color=3D"GREEN">p. 15</font></a></p=
>
<p>the G=EEt=E2 is removed by a considerable linguistic and chronological d=
istance from classical Sanskrit literature. And so far as it goes, this pro=
position agrees with the result of our investigation of the first branch of=
internal evidence.</p>
<p>The next branch of that evidence brings us to the character of the versi=
fication of the G=EEt=E2. Here, again, a survey of Sanskrit verse generally=
, and the verse of the G=EEt=E2 in particular, leads us to a conclusion reg=
arding the position of the G=EEt=E2 in Sanskrit literature, which is in str=
ict accord with the conclusions we have already drawn. In the verse of the =
Vedic Sa<i>m</i>hit=E2s, there is almost nothing like a rigidly fixed schem=
e of versification, no particular collocation of long and short syllables i=
s absolutely necessary. If we attempt to chant them in the mode in which cl=
assical Sanskrit verse is chanted, we invariably come across lines where th=
e chanting cannot be smooth. If we come next to the versification of the Up=
anishads, we observe some progress made towards such fixity of scheme as we=
have alluded to above. Though there are still numerous lines, which cannot=
be smoothly chanted, there are, on the other hand, a not altogether incons=
iderable number which can be smoothly chanted. In the Bhagavadg=EEt=E2 a st=
ill further advance, though a slight one, may, I think, be marked. A visibl=
y larger proportion of the stanzas in the G=EEt=E2 conform to the metrical =
schemes as laid down by the writers on prosody, though there are still sund=
ry verses which do not so conform, and cannot, accordingly, be chanted in t=
he regular way. Lastly, we come to the K=E2vyas and N=E2<i>t</i>akas--the c=
lassical literature. And here in practice we find everywhere a most inflexi=
ble rigidity of scheme, while the theory is laid down in a rule which says,=
that 'even m=E2sha may be changed to masha, but a break of metre should be=
avoided.' This survey of Sanskrit verse may, I think, be fairly treated as=
showing, that adhesion to the metrical schemes is one test of the chronolo=
gical position of a work--the later the work, the more undeviating is such =
adhesion. I need not stay here to point out, how this view receives corrobo=
ration from the rules given on this subject in the standard work</p>
<p><a name=3D"page_16"><font size=3D"1" color=3D"GREEN">p. 16</font></a></p=
>
<p>of Pi<u>n</u>gala on the <i>Kh</i>andas <i>S</i>=E2stra. I will only con=
clude this point by saying, that the argument from the versification of the=
G=EEt=E2, so far as it goes, indicates its position as being prior to the =
classical literature, and nearly contemporaneous with the Upanishad literat=
ure.</p>
<p>We now proceed to investigate the last-group of facts falling under the =
head of internal evidence, as mentioned above. And first as regards the att=
itude of the G=EEt=E2 towards the Vedas. If we examine all the passages in =
the G=EEt=E2, in which reference is made to the Vedas, the aggregate result=
appears to be, that the author of the G=EEt=E2 does not throw the Vedas en=
tirely overboard. He feels and expresses reverence for them, only that reve=
rence is of a somewhat special character. He says in effect, that the prece=
pts of the Vedas are suitable to a certain class of people, of a certain in=
tellectual and spiritual status, so to say. So far their authority is unimp=
eached. But if the unwise sticklers for the authority of the Vedas claim an=
ything more for them than this, then the author of the G=EEt=E2 holds them =
to be wrong. He contends, on the contrary, that acting upon the ordinances =
of the Vedas is an obstacle to the attainment of the summum bonum <a n=
ame=3D"fr_31"></a><a href=3D"http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/sbe08/sbe0802.=
htm#fn_30"><font size=3D"1">1</font></a>. Compare this with the doctrine of=
the Upanishads. The coincidence appears to me to be most noteworthy. In on=
e of his recent lectures, Professor Max M=FCller uses the following eloquen=
t language regarding the Upanishads <a name=3D"fr_32"></a><a href=3D"h=
ttp://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/sbe08/sbe0802.htm#fn_31"><font size=3D"1">2<=
/font></a>: 'Lastly come the Upanishads; and what is their object? To show =
the utter uselessness, nay, the mischievousness of all ritual performances =
(compare our G=EEt=E2, pp. <a href=3D"http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/sbe08=
/sbe0804.htm#page_47">47</a>, <a href=3D"http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/sb=
e08/sbe0804.htm#page_48">48</a>, <a href=3D"http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin=
/sbe08/sbe0811.htm#page_84">84</a> <a name=3D"fr_33"></a><a href=3D"ht=
tp://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/sbe08/sbe0802.htm#fn_32"><font size=3D"1">3</=
font></a>); to condemn every sacrificial act which has for its motive a des=
ire or hope of reward (comp. G=EEt=E2, <a href=3D"http://www.sacred-texts.c=
om/hin/sbe08/sbe0819.htm#page_119">p. 119</a> <a name=3D"fr_34"></a><a=
href=3D"http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/sbe08/sbe0802.htm#fn_33"><font siz=
e=3D"1">4</font></a>); to deny, if not the existence, at least the exceptio=
nal and exalted character of the Devas (comp. G=EEt=E2, pp. <a href=3D"http=
://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/sbe08/sbe0809.htm#page_76">76</a>-<a href=3D"ht=
tp://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/sbe08/sbe0811.htm#page_84">84</a> <a nam=
e=3D"fr_35"></a><a href=3D"http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/sbe08/sbe0802.ht=
m#fn_34"><font size=3D"1">5</font></a>); and to teach that there is no hope=
of salvation and deliverance except by the individual self recognising the=
true and universal self, and finding rest there, where alone rest can be f=
ound <a name=3D"fr_36"></a><a href=3D"http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/=
sbe08/sbe0802.htm#fn_35"><font size=3D"1">6</font></a>' (comp. our G=EEt=E2=
Translation, pp. <a href=3D"http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/sbe08/sbe0810.=
htm#page_78">78</a>-<a href=3D"http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/sbe08/sbe081=
1.htm#page_83">83</a>).</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>
</p>
<p><a name=3D"page_17"><font size=3D"1" color=3D"GREEN">p. 17</font></a></p=
>
<p>The passages to which I have given references in brackets will show, tha=
t Professor Max M=FCller's words might all be used with strict accuracy reg=
arding the essential teaching of the Bhagavadg=EEt=E2. We have here, theref=
ore, another strong circumstance in favour of grouping the G=EEt=E2 with th=
e Upanishads. One more point is worthy of note. Wherever the G=EEt=E2 refer=
s to the Vedas in the somewhat disparaging manner I have noted, no distinct=
ion is taken between the portion whi.ch relates to the ritual and the porti=
on which relates to that higher science, viz. the science of the soul, whic=
h Sanatkum=E2ri speaks of in his famous dialogue with N=E2rada <a name=
=3D"fr_37"></a><a href=3D"http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/sbe08/sbe0802.htm=
#fn_36"><font size=3D"1">1</font></a>. At G=EEt=E2, chapter II, stanza 45, =
Ar<i>g</i>una is told that the Vedas relate only to the effects of the thre=
e qualities, which effects Ar<i>g</i>una is instructed to overcome. At G=EE=
t=E2, chapter VI, stanza 44, Ar<i>g</i>una is told that he who has acquired=
some little devotion, and then exerts himself for further progress, rises =
above the Divine word--the Vedas. And there are also one or two other passa=
ges of the like nature. They all treat the Vedas as concerned with ritual a=
lone. They make no reference to any portion of the Vedas dealing with the h=
igher knowledge. If the word Ved=E2nta, at G=EEt=E2, chapter XV, stanza 15 =
(p. 113), signifies, as it seems to signify, this latter portion of the Ved=
as, then that is the only allusion to it. But, from all the passages in the=
G=EEt=E2 which refer to the Vedas, I am inclined to draw the inference, th=
at the Upanishads of the Vedas, were composed at a time not far removed fro=
m the time of the composition of the G=EEt=E2, and that at that period the =
Upanishads had not yet risen to the position of high importance which they =
afterwards commanded. In the passage referred to at chapter XV, the word Ve=
d=E2ntas probably signifies the =C2ra<i>n</i>yakas, which may be regarded a=
s marking the beginning of the epoch, which the composition of the Upanisha=
ds brought to its close. And it is to the close of this epoch, that I would=
assign the birth of the G=EEt=E2, which is</p>
<p>
</p>
<p><a name=3D"page_18"><font size=3D"1" color=3D"GREEN">p. 18</font></a></p=
>
<p>probably one of the youngest members of the group to which it belongs.</=
p>
<p>It appears to me, that this conclusion is corroborated by the fact that =
a few stanzas in the G=EEt=E2 are identical with some stanzas in some of th=
e Upanishads. With regard to the epic age of Greece, Mr. E. A. Freeman has =
said that, in carrying ourselves back to that age, 'we must cast aside all =
the notions with which we are familiar in our own age about property legal =
or moral in literary compositions. It is plain that there were phrases, epi=
thets, whole lines, which were the common property of the whole epic school=
of poetry <a name=3D"fr_38"></a><a href=3D"http://www.sacred-texts.co=
m/hin/sbe08/sbe0802.htm#fn_37"><font size=3D"1">1</font></a>.' It appears t=
o me that we must accept this proposition as equally applicable to the earl=
y days of Sanskrit literature, having regard to the common passages which w=
e meet with in sundry of the Vedic works, and also sometimes, I believe, in=
the different Pur=E2<i>n</i>as. If this view is correct, then the fact tha=
t the G=EEt=E2 contains some stanzas in the very words which we meet with i=
n some of the Upanishads, indicates, to my mind, that the conclusion alread=
y drawn from other data about the position of the G=EEt=E2 with regard to t=
he Upanishads, is not by any means unwarranted, but one to which the facts =
before us rather seem to point.</p>
<p>And here we may proceed to draw attention to another fact connected with=
the relation of the G=EEt=E2 to the Vedas. In stanza 17 of the ninth chapt=
er of the G=EEt=E2, only <i>Rik</i>, <i>S</i>=E2man, and Ya<i>g</i>us are m=
entioned. The Atharva-veda is not referred to at all. This omission does ce=
rtainly seem a very noteworthy one. For it is in a passage where the Suprem=
e Being is identifying himself with everything, and where, therefore, the f=
ourth Veda might fairly be expected to be mentioned. I may add that in comm=
enting on <i>S</i>a<u>n</u>kar=E2k=E2rya's remarks on this passage, =C2nand=
agiri (and Madhus=FBdana Sarasvat=EE also)seems evidently to have been cons=
cious of the possible force of this omission of the Atharva-veda. He accord=
ingly says that by force of the word 'and' in the verse in question, the At=
harv=E2<u>n</u>girasas, or Atharva-veda must</p>
<p>
</p>
<p><a name=3D"page_19"><font size=3D"1" color=3D"GREEN">p. 19</font></a></p=
>
<p>also be included. Are we at liberty to infer from this, that the Atharva=
-veda did not exist in the days when the G=EEt=E2 was composed? The explana=
tion ordinarily given for the omission of that Veda, where such omission oc=
curs, namely, that it is not of any use in ordinary sacrificial matters, is=
one which can scarcely have any force in the present instance; though it i=
s adequate, perhaps, to explain the words 'those who know the three branche=
s of knowledge,' which occur only a few lines after the verse now under con=
sideration. The commentators render no further help than has been already s=
tated. Upon the whole, however, while I am not yet quite prepared to say, t=
hat the priority of the G=EEt=E2, even to the recognition of the Atharva-ve=
da as a real Veda, may be fairly inferred from the passage in question, I t=
hink that the passage is noteworthy as pointing in that direction. But furt=
her data in explanation of the omission referred to must be awaited.</p>
<p>If the conclusions here indicated about the relative positions of the G=
=EEt=E2 and certain Vedic works are correct, we can fairly take the second =
century B. C. as a terminus before which the G=EEt=E2 must have been compos=
ed. For the Upanishads are mentioned in the Mah=E2bh=E2shya of Pata=F1<i>g<=
/i>ali, which we are probably safe in assigning to the middle of that centu=
ry. The epoch of the older Upanishads, therefore, to which reference has be=
en so frequently made here, may well be placed at some period prior to the =
beginning of the second century B. C. The Atharva-veda is likewise mentione=
d by Pata=F1<i>g</i>ali <a name=3D"fr_39"></a><a href=3D"http://www.sa=
cred-texts.com/hin/sbe08/sbe0802.htm#fn_38"><font size=3D"1">1</font></a>, =
and as 'ninefold,' too, be it remembered; so that if we are entitled to dra=
w the conclusion which has been mentioned above from chapter IX, stanza 17,=
we come to the same period for the date of the G=EEt=E2. Another point to =
note in this connexion is the reference to the S=E2ma-veda as the best of t=
he Vedas (see <a href=3D"http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/sbe08/sbe0812.htm#=
page_88">p. 88</a>). That is a fact which seems to be capable of yielding s=
ome chronological information. For the estimation in which that Veda has be=
en held appears to have varied at different times. Thus, in the Aitareya-br=
=E2hma<i>n</i>a <a name=3D"fr_40"></a><a href=3D"http://www.sacred-tex=
ts.com/hin/sbe08/sbe0802.htm#fn_39"><font size=3D"1">2</font></a>, the glor=
y</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>
</p>
<p><a name=3D"page_20"><font size=3D"1" color=3D"GREEN">p. 20</font></a></p=
>
<p>of the S=E2man is declared to be higher than that of the <i>Rik</i>, In =
the <i>Kh</i>=E2ndogya-upanishad <a name=3D"fr_41"></a><a href=3D"http=
://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/sbe08/sbe0802.htm#fn_40"><font size=3D"1">1</fo=
nt></a> the S=E2man is said to be the essence of the <i>Rik</i>, which <i>S=
</i>a<u>n</u>kara interprets by saying that the S=E2man is more weighty, In=
the Pra<i>s</i>na-upanishad <a name=3D"fr_42"></a><a href=3D"http://w=
ww.sacred-texts.com/hin/sbe08/sbe0802.htm#fn_41"><font size=3D"1">2</font><=
/a>, too, the implication of the passage V, 5 (in which the S=E2man is stat=
ed as the guide to the Brahmaloka, while the Ya<i>g</i>us is said to guide =
to the lunar world, and the <i>Rik</i> to the, human world) is to the same =
effect. And we may also mention as on the same side the N<i>ri</i>si<i>m</i=
>ha T=E2pin=EE-upanishad and the Vedic passage cited in the commentary of, =
<i>S</i>a<u>n</u>kara on the closing sentence of the first kha<i>nd</i>a of=
that Upanishad <a name=3D"fr_43"></a><a href=3D"http://www.sacred-tex=
ts.com/hin/sbe08/sbe0802.htm#fn_42"><font size=3D"1">3</font></a>. On the o=
ther side, we have the statement in Manu that the sound of the S=E2ma-veda =
is unholy; and the consequent direction that where the sound of it is heard=
, the <i>Rik</i> and Ya<i>g</i>us should not be recited <a name=3D"fr_=
44"></a><a href=3D"http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/sbe08/sbe0802.htm#fn_43"=
><font size=3D"1">4</font></a>. We have also the passages from some of the =
Pur=E2<i>n</i>as noted by Dr. Muir in his excellent work, Original Sanskrit=
Texts, which point in the same direction <a name=3D"fr_45"></a><a hre=
f=3D"http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/sbe08/sbe0802.htm#fn_44"><font size=3D=
"1">5</font></a>. And we have further the direction in the =C2pastamba Dhar=
ma-s=FBtra, that the S=E2man hymns should not be recited where the other Ve=
das are being recited <a name=3D"fr_46"></a><a href=3D"http://www.sacr=
ed-texts.com/hin/sbe08/sbe0802.htm#fn_45"><font size=3D"1">6</font></a>, as=
well as the grouping of the sound of the S=E2man with various classes of o=
bjectionable and unholy noises, such as those of dogs and asses. It is pret=
ty evident that the view of =C2pastamba is based on the same theory as that=
of Manu. Now in looking at the two classes of authorities thus marshalled,=
it is plain that the G=EEt=E2 ranges itself with those which are unquestio=
nably the more ancient. And among the less ancient works, prior to which we=
may place the G=EEt=E2 on account of the facts now under consideration, ar=
e Manu and =C2pastamba. Now Manu's date is not ascertained, though, I belie=
ve, he is now generally considered to belong to about the second or third c=
entury B. C. <a name=3D"fr_47"></a><a href=3D"http://www.sacred-texts.=
com/hin/sbe08/sbe0802.htm#fn_46"><font size=3D"1">7</font></a> But . I</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>
</p>
<p><a name=3D"page_21"><font size=3D"1" color=3D"GREEN">p. 21</font></a></p=
>
<p><font size=3D"-2" color=3D"GREEN">[paragraph continues]</font> Dr. B=FCh=
ler, in the Preface to his =C2pastamba in the present series, has adduced g=
ood reasons for holding that =C2pastamba is prior to the third century B. C=
. <a name=3D"fr_48"></a><a href=3D"http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/sbe=
08/sbe0802.htm#fn_47"><font size=3D"1">1</font></a>, and we therefore obtai=
n that as a point of time prior to which the G=EEt=E2 must have been compos=
ed.</p>
<p>The next important item of internal evidence which we have to note, is t=
he view taken of caste in the Bhagavadg=EEt=E2. Here, again, a comparison o=
f the doctrine of the G=EEt=E2 with the conception of caste in Manu and =C2=
pastamba is interesting and instructive. The view of Manu has been already =
contrasted by me with the G=EEt=E2 in another place <a name=3D"fr_49">=
</a><a href=3D"http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/sbe08/sbe0802.htm#fn_48"><fo=
nt size=3D"1">2</font></a>. I do not propose to dwell on that point here, a=
s the date of Manu is far from being satisfactorily ascertained. I prefer n=
ow to take up =C2pastamba only, whose date, as just now stated, is fairly w=
ell fixed by Dr. B=FChler. The division of castes, then, is twice referred =
to in the Bhagavadg=EEt=E2. In the first passage (<a href=3D"http://www.sac=
red-texts.com/hin/sbe08/sbe0806.htm#page_59">p. 59</a>) it is stated, that =
the division rests on differences of qualities and duties; in the second (p=
p. <a href=3D"http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/sbe08/sbe0820.htm#page_126">1=
26</a>, <a href=3D"http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/sbe08/sbe0820.htm#page_1=
27">127</a>) the various duties are distinctly stated according to the diff=
erences of qualities. Now in the first place, noting as we pass along, that=
there is nothing in the G=EEt=E2 to indicate whether caste was hereditary,=
according to its view, whereas =C2pastamba distinctly states it to be such=
, let us compare the second passage of the G=EEt=E2 with the S=FBtras of =
=C2pastamba bearing on the point. The view enunciated in the G=EEt=E2 appea=
rs to me plainly to belong to an earlier age--to an age of considerably les=
s advancement in social and religious development. In the G=EEt=E2, for ins=
tance, the duties of a Br=E2hma<i>n</i>a are said to be tranquillity, self-=
restraint, and so forth. In =C2pastamba, they are the famous six duties, na=
mely, study, imparting instruction, sacrificing, officiating at others' sac=
rifices, making gifts, and receiving gifts; and three others, namely, inher=
itance, occupancy, and gleaning ears of corn, which, it may be remarked en =
passant, are not stated in Manu. The former seem to my mind to point</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>
</p>
<p><a name=3D"page_22"><font size=3D"1" color=3D"GREEN">p. 22</font></a></p=
>
<p>to the age when the qualities which in early times gave the Br=E2hma<i>n=
</i>as their pre-eminence in Hindu society were still a living reality =
;<a name=3D"fr_50"></a><a href=3D"http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/sbe08/sbe=
0802.htm#fn_49"><font size=3D"1">1</font></a>. It will be noted, too, that =
there is nothing in that list of duties which has any necessary or natural =
connexion with any privilege as belonging to the caste. The Law lays down t=
hese duties, in the true sense of the word. In =C2pastamba, on the contrary=
, we see an advance towards the later view on both points. You have no refe=
rence to moral and religious qualities now. You have to do with ceremonies =
and acts. You have under the head 'duties not mere obligations, but rights.=
For the duty of receiving gifts is a right, and so is the duty of teaching=
others and officiating at others' sacrifices; as we know not merely from t=
he subsequent course of events, but also from a comparison of the duties of=
Br=E2hma<i>n</i>as on the one hand, and Kshatriyas, Vai<i>s</i>yas, and <i=
>S</i>=FBdras on the other, as laid down by Manu and =C2pastamba themselves=
. =C2pastamba's rules, therefore, appear to belong to the time when the Br=
=E2hma<i>n</i>as had long been an established power, and were assuming to t=
hemselves those valuable privileges which they have always claimed in later=
times. The rules of the G=EEt=E2, on the other hand, point to a time consi=
derably prior to this--to a time when the Br=E2hma<i>n</i>as were by their =
moral and intellectual qualities laying the foundation of that preeminence =
in Hindu society which afterwards enabled them to lord it over all castes. =
These observations mutatis mutandis apply to the rules regarding. the other=
castes also. Here again, while the G=EEt=E2 still insists on the inner qua=
lities, which properly constitute the military profession, for instance, th=
e rules of =C2pastamba indicate the powerful influence of the Br=E2hma<i>n<=
/i>as <a name=3D"fr_51"></a><a href=3D"http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin=
/sbe08/sbe0802.htm#fn_50"><font size=3D"1">2</font></a>. For, as stated bef=
ore, officiating at others' sacrifices, instructing others, and receiving p=
resents, are here expressly prohibited to Kshatriyas as also to Vai<i>s</i>=
yas. The result of that is, that the Br=E2hma<i>n</i>as become indispensabl=
e to the Kshatriyas and Vai<i>s</i>yas, for</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>
</p>
<p><a name=3D"page_23"><font size=3D"1" color=3D"GREEN">p. 23</font></a></p=
>
<p>upon both the duty of study, of offering sacrifices, and making gifts an=
d presents is inculcated. In his outline of the History of Ancient Religion=
s, Professor Tiele, speaking of the 'increasing influence of the Br=E2hmans=
,' writes as follows: 'Subject at first to the princes and nobles, and depe=
ndent on them, they began by insinuating themselves into their favour, and =
representing it as a religious duty to show protection and liberality towar=
ds them. Meanwhile they endeavoured to make themselves indispensable to the=
m, gradually acquired the sole right to conduct public worship, and made th=
emselves masters of instruction <a name=3D"fr_52"></a><a href=3D"http:=
//www.sacred-texts.com/hin/sbe08/sbe0802.htm#fn_51"><font size=3D"1">1</fon=
t></a>'. And after pointing out the high position thus achieved by the Br=
=E2hmans, and the low position of the K=E2<i>nd</i>=E2las and others of the=
inferior castes, he adds: 'Such a position could not long be endured; and =
this serves to explain not only the rise of Buddhism, but also its rapid di=
ffusion, and the radical revolution which it brought about <a name=3D"=
fr_53"></a><a href=3D"http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/sbe08/sbe0802.htm#fn_=
52"><font size=3D"1">2</font></a>.' To proceed, however, with our compariso=
n of the G=EEt=E2 and =C2pastamba. The superiority distinctly claimed by th=
e latter for the Br=E2hma<i>n</i>a is not quite clearly brought out in the =
G=EEt=E2. 'Holy Br=E2hma<i>n</i>as and devoted royal saints' are bracketed =
together at <a href=3D"http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/sbe08/sbe0811.htm#pa=
ge_86">p. 86</a>; while the Kshatriyas are declared to have been the channe=
l of communication between the Deity and mankind as regards the great doctr=
ine of devotion propounded by the Bhagavadg=EEt=E2. That indicates a positi=
on for the Kshatriyas much more like what the Upanishads disclose <a n=
ame=3D"fr_54"></a><a href=3D"http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/sbe08/sbe0802.=
htm#fn_53"><font size=3D"1">3</font></a>, than even that which =C2pastamba =
assigns to them. The fact is further noteworthy, that in the G=EEt=E2 each =
caste has its own entirely distinct set of duties. There is no overlapping,=
so to say. And that is a circumstance indicating a very early stage in the=
development of the institution <a name=3D"fr_55"></a><a href=3D"http:=
//www.sacred-texts.com/hin/sbe08/sbe0802.htm#fn_54"><font size=3D"1">4</fon=
t></a>. Besides, as already indicated,</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>
</p>
<p><a name=3D"page_24"><font size=3D"1" color=3D"GREEN">p. 24</font></a></p=
>
<p>the duties laid down by =C2pastamba and Manu as common to Kshatriyas and=
Vai<i>s</i>yas are the very duties which make those castes dependent to a =
very great extent on the Br=E2hma<i>n</i>as. Lastly, it is not altogether u=
nworthy of note, that in the elaborate specification of the best of every s=
pecies which we find in chapter X, the Br=E2hma<i>n</i>a is not mentioned a=
s the best of the castes, there is nothing to indicate the notion contained=
in the well-known later verse, 'The Br=E2hma<i>n</i>a is the head of the c=
astes.' On the contrary, the ruler of men is specified as the highest among=
men <a name=3D"fr_56"></a><a href=3D"http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/=
sbe08/sbe0802.htm#fn_55"><font size=3D"1">1</font></a>, indicating, perhaps=
, a state of society such as that described at the beginning of the extract=
from Professor Tiele's work quoted above.</p>
<p>We come now to another point. What is the position of the G=EEt=E2 in re=
gard to the great reform of <i>S</i>=E2kya Muni, The question is one of muc=
h interest, having regard particularly to the remarkable coincidences betwe=
en Buddhistic doctrines and the doctrines of the G=EEt=E2 to which we have =
drawn attention in the foot-notes to our translation. But the materials for=
deciding the question are unhappily not forthcoming. Professor Wilson, ind=
eed, thought that there was an allusion to Buddhism in the G=EEt=E2 <a=
name=3D"fr_57"></a><a href=3D"http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/sbe08/sbe080=
2.htm#fn_56"><font size=3D"1">2</font></a>. But his idea was based on a con=
fusion between the Buddhists and the <i>K</i>=E2rv=E2kas or materialists&nb=
sp;<a name=3D"fr_58"></a><a href=3D"http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/sbe08/s=
be0802.htm#fn_57"><font size=3D"1">3</font></a>. Failing that allusion, we =
have nothing very tangible but the unsatisfactory 'negative argument' based=
on mere non-mention of Buddhism in the G=EEt=E2. That argument is not quit=
e satisfactory to my own mind, although, as I have elsewhere pointed out&nb=
sp;<a name=3D"fr_59"></a><a href=3D"http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/sbe08/s=
be0802.htm#fn_58"><font size=3D"1">4</font></a>, some of the ground occupie=
d by the G=EEt=E2 is common to it with Buddhism, and although various previ=
ous thinkers Are alluded to directly or indirectly in the G=EEt=E2. There i=
s, however, one view of the facts of this question, which appears to me to =
corroborate the conclusion deducible by means of the negative argument here=
referred to. The</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>
</p>