You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Ideas with Kevin Schulman on how to develop concept
• Could be simple Excel model to show potential productivity model
○ On potential difference of top-of-the-license percentage
• Simple profile provider practices just in department of medicine
○ Top license mix, may not be 100%, but can at least specify a more consistent rate
• Look at how often proceduralist visits don't lead to procedures
○ Maybe E&M for counseling
Okay for specialist E&M is valuable, just not generating a bunch of "toys" and technical fees. Get access to the intelligence, without the technology.
○ Calculate the mix of services across specialty disciplines
§ Tells you what top-of-the-license is in the group, so how to meet demand
§ Take that to markets on how to design and allocate hiring (otherwise just hiring based on more RVU > cost of individual)
§ What's minimal volume of services for high quality service
□ Try comparing state by state at organizational level
□ Score at top of license
○ Could just interview some specialists, how many visits could have been done by PCP
○ Relative Index "Top of License"
§ Then compare across practitioners and then across providers
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Ideas with Kevin Schulman on how to develop concept
Okay for specialist E&M is valuable, just not generating a bunch of "toys" and technical fees. Get access to the intelligence, without the technology.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: