Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Estimate Clinic visits that were not a "top-of-the-license" use of the specialist/expert. #357

Open
jonc101 opened this issue Sep 23, 2020 · 0 comments

Comments

@jonc101
Copy link
Collaborator

jonc101 commented Sep 23, 2020

Ideas with Kevin Schulman on how to develop concept

• Could be simple Excel model to show potential productivity model
	○ On potential difference of top-of-the-license percentage
• Simple profile provider practices just in department of medicine

	○ Top license mix, may not be 100%, but can at least specify a more consistent rate
• Look at how often proceduralist visits don't lead to procedures
	○ Maybe E&M for counseling

Okay for specialist E&M is valuable, just not generating a bunch of "toys" and technical fees. Get access to the intelligence, without the technology.

	○ Calculate the mix of services across specialty disciplines
		§ Tells you what top-of-the-license is in the group, so how to meet demand
		§ Take that to markets on how to design and allocate hiring (otherwise just hiring based on more RVU > cost of individual)
		§ What's minimal volume of services for high quality service
			□ Try comparing state by state at organizational level
			□ Score at top of license
	○ Could just interview some specialists, how many visits could have been done by PCP

	○ Relative Index "Top of License" 
		§ Then compare across practitioners and then across providers
@jonc101 jonc101 created this issue from a note in Outpatient Specialty Consultation Support (To do) Sep 23, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant