Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[FEATURE REQ] add API endpoints to add indexers/feeds #1456

Open
appiekap653 opened this issue Mar 12, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

[FEATURE REQ] add API endpoints to add indexers/feeds #1456

appiekap653 opened this issue Mar 12, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
Feature request New features, improvements etc

Comments

@appiekap653
Copy link

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
It would be nice to be able to add support for Prowlarr to automatically sync indexers/feeds into Autobrr.
But to open a feature request for Prowlarr, the API of Autobrr need to have those endpoints first.

The intent for Prowlarr is to be the one central place to manage (add/edit/delete) indexers.
It would be nice to leave the responsibility there instead of having to add/edit/delete in Prowlarr first, then again in Autobrr.

This would also give solution to issues #1344 and #961 because the name of the indexers/feeds will get synced properly.

Describe the solution you'd like
Expand the API indexers/ feeds endpoint to support adding from Prowlarr.

@appiekap653 appiekap653 added the Feature request New features, improvements etc label Mar 12, 2024
@zze0s
Copy link
Collaborator

zze0s commented Mar 12, 2024

Hi!

The endpoints already exists, the webui is all using the API, it's just not very well documented because there has been no need for it. 🙂

Prowlarr indexers and autobrr indexers (torznab ones at least) do have some differences and won't be a 1-1 mapping.

I'm pretty confident that if you open a feature req in Prowlarr they will tell you that it's on us to implement their API's to allow for sync, not the other way around.

It would only be beneficial for the indexers that does not have IRC and only rely on Torznab because we use different data/creds etc in many cases and the IRC part would have to be manual either way.

I'm not opposed to this but it's not something I'm planning to work on in the near future.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Feature request New features, improvements etc
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants