Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Restore the functionality of RF score() #3685

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Apr 1, 2021

Conversation

hcho3
Copy link
Contributor

@hcho3 hcho3 commented Mar 31, 2021

Closes #3682

In #3609, I unintentionally broke the function score() in the random forest. This PR restores the functionality. In addition, I added score() to one of the unit tests to ensure that score() does not break again.

@hcho3 hcho3 requested a review from a team as a code owner March 31, 2021 22:25
@github-actions github-actions bot added the Cython / Python Cython or Python issue label Mar 31, 2021
@hcho3 hcho3 added bug Something isn't working non-breaking Non-breaking change labels Mar 31, 2021
@JohnZed
Copy link
Contributor

JohnZed commented Mar 31, 2021

@hcho3 note that this doesn't count as a hotfix as it's targeting 0.19 which is still open for business.

@JohnZed
Copy link
Contributor

JohnZed commented Mar 31, 2021

@gpucibot merge

@hcho3 hcho3 changed the title Hot fix for RF score() Restore the functionality of RF score() Mar 31, 2021
@hcho3 hcho3 added the 5 - Ready to Merge Testing and reviews complete, ready to merge label Mar 31, 2021
@rapids-bot rapids-bot bot merged commit 66931b9 into rapidsai:branch-0.19 Apr 1, 2021
@hcho3 hcho3 deleted the hot_fix_score branch April 1, 2021 03:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
5 - Ready to Merge Testing and reviews complete, ready to merge bug Something isn't working Cython / Python Cython or Python issue non-breaking Non-breaking change
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[BUG] RandomForestClassifier score failing due to output_class handling
2 participants