It appears the binary name from MinGW has changed. Updating the name. #3
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
0intro
force-pushed
the
master
branch
2 times, most recently
from
002b62c
to
279e133
Compare
|
I've checked and it seems that i686-w64-mingw32 is now the name used on most of Linux distributions. I've edited the subject and merged your PR. Thanks. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Pulled down the source and went to compile the windows binary on my linux box, and saw that the compiler wasn't being found. Some digging suggests that mingw now comes with
i686-w64-mingw32, and no longer comes withi586-mingw32msvc. The general usage page mentions the i686 variant, for example. So, figured I'd push that over here, since others may run into the issue.Thanks!