[SoHoAudit] Combined taker fees exceeding MAX_INT will revert execution rather than successfully process MixinMatchOrders.sol#281-284:

[0xHaas]

While unlikely to occur, if an order is to be fulfilled in which the properly owed taker fees paid out to a singular party exceed MAX_INT, the process will revert rather than establish a secondary methodology by which to pay relevant taker fees to the according address.

Despite the likeliness of occurrence, this behavior should be noted and presented accordingly. Usage of require is suggested in order to provide justification as to why the transaction failed to complete.

[abandeali1]

This should actually never happen since the total supply of ZRX is only 10^27 :)