Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

oclvanitygen++ only supports legacy P2PKH addresses #55

Open
benthetechguy opened this issue Jan 1, 2023 · 6 comments
Open

oclvanitygen++ only supports legacy P2PKH addresses #55

benthetechguy opened this issue Jan 1, 2023 · 6 comments

Comments

@benthetechguy
Copy link

If I run the taproot example in the readme, but with oclvanitygen++ instead of vanitygen++, I get Invalid format 'p2tr'.

@benthetechguy
Copy link
Author

This is also true for native segwit's p2wpkh format.

@juniorcines
Copy link

Hi, I'm using ubuntu and I have a NVIDIA RTX 3090 card.

I try to use with GPU and I get the following error:
do you know how i can fix it?

clGetPlatformIDs(0): Unknown code -1001
Could not open any device
clGetPlatformIDs(0): Unknown code -1001
Available OpenCL platforms:

@benthetechguy
Copy link
Author

That's unrelated to this issue, please create your own.

@benthetechguy
Copy link
Author

It turns out script for P2SH addresses doesn't work either…

@benthetechguy benthetechguy changed the title oclvanitygen++ doesn't support taproot addresses oclvanitygen++ only supports legacy P2PKH addresses Jan 20, 2023
@10gic
Copy link
Owner

10gic commented Jan 20, 2023

It turns out script for P2SH addresses doesn't work either…

The feature "script for P2SH" is inherited from the project https://github.com/samr7/vanitygen. Could you share some more details? What is the current output and what is the expected output?

@benthetechguy
Copy link
Author

Current output is Invalid format 'script' just like p2tr and p2wpkh did, and expected output is that it starts generating a P2SH address.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants