-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 31
Order "Report type" options #360
Comments
Update: I see that they're actually grouped in a logical way (all monthly reports are together, for instance). But maybe those should be broken out into their own dropdown? |
Is this still something we want to do? If so @PaulClark2 could you share the order you shared earlier? I can't find it. |
@noahmanger will also send to you in Slack DM Form Types Selections: Report Type Selections (including or excluding the report code) Quarterly Reports Semi-annual Reports Election Sensitive Reports Other Reports Bundling Reports |
There's a few I see in our list that aren't included here:
Where do those go? |
@noahmanger These are ancient report codes but all of them go in the "Election Sensitive Reports" section. |
Should we designate that those are old codes? Their names are the same as the others in the "Election Sensitive Reports" so curious how to deduplicate. |
Also, do we want to break these report types out into their own filters? It would make for several more filters, but each one would be far more usable. |
Also, with Forms 5 and 24 being "Independent Expenditure Reports and Notices" -- do we just want one option that fills in two form types? Or include each one as a separate option? |
More questions:
|
The descriptions for these 4 are duplicated by newer report type codes. I think we have two options and I don't have a preference for option 1 or 2. I think either would work.
The other two 10D and 30D are not duplicated by newer reports. |
Forms 5 and 24 being "Independent Expenditure Reports and Notices": This might be a usability question. We group them like this because we assumed users would want to see all 24-hour and 48-hour reports of independent expenditures and would be less concerned if if the filer was a registered committee (F24) or a person/group (F5). It makes sense to me to keep them together but I'm willing to listen to other ideas |
There is no M1 report. Oddity of our monthly report naming convention is the report covers financial activity of the prior month. So the M2 - February Monthly discloses financial activity for the month of January. The Year-End code, YE, for monthly, quarterly and semi-annual reports is the same. We use it three times because we have monthly, quarterly and semi-annual report types in 3 groups. So that it's clear each type of filer files a year-end report. I'm open to modifying that. However, if we make separate filters for each group then we'd need YE to be in each filter. If we have multiple filers, do you think users would be confused? Good filter labels would help. I agree having the report types in short lists probably helps people. Will they be able to select YE and M2? I ask this because most presidential filers file quarterly in the odd year before the election but file monthly during the election year. So if you look at the current presidential candidates they are filing quarterly reports but in February 2016 they will start filing monthly reports. |
Cool. This all makes sense. Based on how the code is now, it will be easiest if we restrict each option to just one report code each (@jmcarp feel free to jump in and say it's super easy to do otherwise), but I think that's fine. Here's my suggestion for how to label the fields in question:
And then I the hearing how YE is the same for all, I think it makes sense to break each type out into a separate filter (monthly, quarterly, etc.) and include Year-End in each. The filters would all be additive, so you could do YE and M2 and it would show all Year End reports and all February Monthly reports. |
I like it! |
PR updated to reflect these changes #604 |
Merged #604. |
And maybe think of a better way to group these or something. Not sure at the moment.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: