This repository has been archived by the owner on Dec 23, 2017. It is now read-only.
Use consistent limit for reports and totals charts. #106
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
If you already started, you can go for it. We will need it eventually. When I said it was not a problem, I just meant it is not as important as the things that are broken or wrong. Also what would need to scale the charts to work for a wide range of committees. Presidential are going to raise way more than a random committee. We want a scale to look good on both. |
|
Yeah I think this is good to include now fwiw. |
|
I'm running this locally and not seeing the results limited. |
|
@noahmanger what are you using for |
msecret
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 30, 2015
Use consistent limit for reports and totals charts.
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
[Resolves https://github.com/18F/openFEC/issues/641]
@LindsayYoung I just saw that you marked this as not a problem, but it's a tiny change anyway. We can close the PR if it's better to wait for quarterly results.