Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Dec 23, 2017. It is now read-only.

Feature/glossary improvements #232

Conversation

jmcarp
Copy link
Contributor

@jmcarp jmcarp commented Jun 3, 2015

A few proposed changes to the new glossary:

  • When the user clicks a term on the page, show only that term in the glossary
  • When the user clicks a term on the page, expand the term's definition
  • Install list.js with npm
  • Fix merge conflicts

@noahmanger: I'm happy to update the tests and/or talk through how they work. I can also work on filtering items by title and not by contents (agreed that this is potentially confusing) if you think that's the correct behavior.

Noah Manger and others added 12 commits June 2, 2015 11:39
People want to see the various parts of the report at the same time
so not collapsing the other accordion items when you open a new one
is better.
Users of the accordion plugin might want to configure it so it closes
the various items when you open a new one.
When a user sees a chart for a negative value, they should see a
bar chart of zero.

TODO:
A better implementation of this would be to actually show a negative
value through a different kind of chart or a different color, but this
requires design consideration.
…g_accordion

Feature/897 stop collapsing accordion
…th_negatives

Ensures charts properly deal with negative values
@noahmanger
Copy link
Contributor

Great! Those changes def help. I'm really not sure if it's better to just search the term or also the definition. How much work do you think that'd take?

Also, I'm pretty slammed today so if you're able to just update the tests that'd be great. I'll look at what you do and ask any questions.

noahmanger pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 3, 2015
@noahmanger noahmanger merged commit ea3dcff into fecgov:feature/glossary-improvements Jun 3, 2015
@jmcarp
Copy link
Contributor Author

jmcarp commented Jun 3, 2015

@noahmanger I'll update the tests and look into modifying the search today.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants