This repository has been archived by the owner on Dec 23, 2017. It is now read-only.
Feature/big number links #878
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
for the Presidential and independent expenditure totals. We don't show the IE spending on that page anymore, but There isn't a better way to explain where we get that number. Not having a link for it might imply that the presidential link would give the information, which it doesn't. We could improve this in the future, when we have a view for IEs. resolves #697
|
LGTM, but we should always use |
|
Thanks for catching that! I will update it now! |
It means amendment, not amended
discussed in #876
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Adding links to forms that have the relevant information
for the Presidential and independent expenditure totals.
We don't show the IE spending on that page anymore, but
There isn't a better way to explain where we get that
number. Not having a link for it might imply that the
presidential link would give the information, which it
doesn't.
We could improve this in the future, when we have a
view for IEs.
resolves #697