Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
46 lines (31 loc) · 6.97 KB

Friedmann legal theory pdf 18 The role of morality justice and human rights in legal reasoning.md

File metadata and controls

46 lines (31 loc) · 6.97 KB

A Review of Wolfgang Friedmann's Legal Theory

Wolfgang Friedmann was a German-born jurist and scholar who wrote extensively on the philosophy of law and international law. His book Legal Theory, first published in 1960 and revised in 1967, is a comprehensive and critical analysis of the main schools of legal thought, from natural law to legal realism, as well as the historical and sociological dimensions of law.

In this article, I will summarize the main arguments and contributions of Friedmann's Legal Theory, as well as some of the criticisms and limitations of his approach. I will also discuss the relevance and impact of his work for contemporary legal scholarship and practice.

Download Zip ⚙ https://t.co/Kbjon1s7me

The Scope and Method of Legal Theory

Friedmann defines legal theory as "the systematic exposition of the nature, origin, development, and function of law" [^1^]. He argues that legal theory should not be confined to a narrow analysis of legal rules and concepts, but should also consider the broader social, historical, and ethical context of law. He also emphasizes the importance of comparative and interdisciplinary perspectives, as well as the need for critical evaluation and reform of existing legal systems.

friedmann legal theory book pdf chapter 18, download friedmann legal theory pdf 18th edition, friedmann legal theory pdf 18 summary and analysis, friedmann legal theory pdf 18 free online, friedmann legal theory pdf 18 citation and references, friedmann legal theory pdf 18 quiz and answers, friedmann legal theory pdf 18 review and critique, friedmann legal theory pdf 18 notes and highlights, friedmann legal theory pdf 18 introduction and conclusion, friedmann legal theory pdf 18 table of contents and index, friedmann legal theory pdf 18 key concepts and terms, friedmann legal theory pdf 18 case studies and examples, friedmann legal theory pdf 18 historical and contemporary context, friedmann legal theory pdf 18 comparison and contrast, friedmann legal theory pdf 18 strengths and weaknesses, friedmann legal theory pdf 18 implications and applications, friedmann legal theory pdf 18 perspectives and debates, friedmann legal theory pdf 18 questions and comments, friedmann legal theory pdf 18 suggestions and recommendations, friedmann legal theory pdf 18 feedback and evaluation, friedmann legal theory pdf 18 problems and solutions, friedmann legal theory pdf 18 challenges and opportunities, friedmann legal theory pdf 18 issues and controversies, friedmann legal theory pdf 18 trends and developments, friedmann legal theory pdf 18 research and findings, friedmann legal theory pdf 18 methods and approaches, friedmann legal theory pdf 18 principles and rules, friedmann legal theory pdf 18 arguments and counterarguments, friedmann legal theory pdf 18 facts and figures, friedmann legal theory pdf 18 data and statistics, friedmann legal theory pdf 18 evidence and sources, friedmann legal theory pdf 18 theories and models, friedmann legal theory pdf 18 frameworks and paradigms, friedmann legal theory pdf 18 concepts and categories, friedmann legal theory pdf 18 definitions and meanings, friedmann legal theory pdf 18 assumptions and hypotheses, friedmann legal theory pdf 18 objectives and outcomes, friedmann legal theory pdf 18 aims and purposes, friedmann legal theory pdf 18 rationale and justification, friedmann legal theory pdf 18 scope and limitations, friedmann legal theory pdf 18 structure and organization, friedmann legal theory pdf 18 format and style, friedmann legal theory pdf 18 features and characteristics, friedmann legal theory pdf 18 benefits and advantages, friedmann legal theory pdf 18 drawbacks and disadvantages, friedmann legal theory pdf 18 alternatives and options, friedmann legal theory pdf 18 similarities and differences

Friedmann adopts a historical and sociological method in his legal theory, tracing the evolution of legal ideas and institutions from ancient times to modern times. He also examines the influence of various factors, such as religion, culture, politics, economics, and technology, on the development of law. He identifies four main stages in the history of law: (1) primitive law, (2) classical law, (3) modern law, and (4) contemporary law. He argues that each stage reflects a different balance between individualism and collectivism, as well as between formalism and realism.

The Main Schools of Legal Thought

Friedmann devotes most of his book to a critical examination of the main schools of legal thought that have emerged in Western civilization. He distinguishes between two types of legal theories: (1) normative theories, which prescribe what the law ought to be, and (2) descriptive theories, which describe what the law is or how it works. He also classifies legal theories according to their degree of abstraction or realism.

The main schools of legal thought that Friedmann discusses are:

  • Natural law: This is the oldest and most influential normative theory of law, which holds that there is a higher law or moral order that transcends human laws and that can be discovered by reason or revelation. Friedmann traces the origins and development of natural law from ancient Greece to modern times, highlighting its contributions and limitations. He argues that natural law has been both a source of inspiration and a source of confusion for legal thinkers and practitioners.
  • Legal positivism: This is the dominant descriptive theory of law in modern times, which holds that law is a product of human will or authority and that its validity depends on its conformity with certain criteria or procedures. Friedmann analyzes the main variants and proponents of legal positivism, such as Austin, Kelsen, Hart, and Dworkin. He criticizes legal positivism for its formalism, reductionism, and detachment from reality.
  • Historical school: This is a descriptive theory of law that emerged in Germany in the 19th century, which holds that law is a reflection of the spirit or culture of a people and that its development is determined by historical forces. Friedmann examines the origins and influence of the historical school, especially Savigny and Hegel. He praises the historical school for its recognition of the diversity and dynamism of law, but also points out its shortcomings, such as its conservatism, nationalism, and relativism.
  • Sociological jurisprudence: This is a descriptive theory of law that emerged in America in the late 19th century, which holds that law is a social phenomenon that responds to social needs and interests. Friedmann explores the main ideas and representatives of sociological jurisprudence, such as Holmes, Pound, Cardozo, and Llewellyn. He commends sociological jurisprudence for its realism, pragmatism, and reformism, but also notes its problems, such as its lack of coherence, consistency, and normativity.
  • Legal realism: This is a descriptive theory of law that emerged in America in the early 20th century, 8cf37b1e13