Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Different interpretation of def_conv: #19

Open
bkvie opened this issue Aug 6, 2018 · 1 comment
Open

Different interpretation of def_conv: #19

bkvie opened this issue Aug 6, 2018 · 1 comment

Comments

@bkvie
Copy link

bkvie commented Aug 6, 2018

Thinking about deformable convolutions, some things I found different interpretations of:
-) Does the offset change for each individual k x k kernel or is it fixed for the whole image? Would this mean that pixels could potentially overlap?
-) Is the same offset then applied for each input layer, ie. AxBxC where C might be any number of filters.
-) During inference, keeping the offset generating layers in the network, each k x k kernel would experience an individual offset, or would the offset be the same for the whole image?

@isalirezag
Copy link

did you find any answers?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants