You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
hi, I am quite interested in your code on the NER task, especially, for CONLL 2003 dataset, you have stated that your best test F1 is 91.8%, which is awesome. However, it looks weird to me that the valid and test F1 scores are so close by referring to the paper "End-to-end Sequence Labeling via Bi-directional LSTM-CNNs-CRF" and my experiments. Could you check this issue? Thanks a lot!
Epoch 47/100:
703/703 [==============================] - 95s - Global Step: 33041 - Train Loss: 0.0246
Valid dataset -- accuracy: 98.53, precision: 91.54, recall: 92.12, FB1: 91.83
-- new BEST score on valid dataset: 91.83
Test dataset -- accuracy: 98.52, precision: 91.53, recall: 92.11, FB1: 91.82
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
hi, I am quite interested in your code on the NER task, especially, for CONLL 2003 dataset, you have stated that your best test F1 is 91.8%, which is awesome. However, it looks weird to me that the valid and test F1 scores are so close by referring to the paper "End-to-end Sequence Labeling via Bi-directional LSTM-CNNs-CRF" and my experiments. Could you check this issue? Thanks a lot!
Epoch 47/100:
703/703 [==============================] - 95s - Global Step: 33041 - Train Loss: 0.0246
Valid dataset -- accuracy: 98.53, precision: 91.54, recall: 92.12, FB1: 91.83
-- new BEST score on valid dataset: 91.83
Test dataset -- accuracy: 98.52, precision: 91.53, recall: 92.11, FB1: 91.82
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: