Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Question for the NER performance #4

Closed
jind11 opened this issue Jul 6, 2018 · 1 comment
Closed

Question for the NER performance #4

jind11 opened this issue Jul 6, 2018 · 1 comment

Comments

@jind11
Copy link

jind11 commented Jul 6, 2018

hi, I am quite interested in your code on the NER task, especially, for CONLL 2003 dataset, you have stated that your best test F1 is 91.8%, which is awesome. However, it looks weird to me that the valid and test F1 scores are so close by referring to the paper "End-to-end Sequence Labeling via Bi-directional LSTM-CNNs-CRF" and my experiments. Could you check this issue? Thanks a lot!

Epoch 47/100:
703/703 [==============================] - 95s - Global Step: 33041 - Train Loss: 0.0246
Valid dataset -- accuracy: 98.53, precision: 91.54, recall: 92.12, FB1: 91.83
-- new BEST score on valid dataset: 91.83
Test dataset -- accuracy: 98.52, precision: 91.53, recall: 92.11, FB1: 91.82

@26hzhang
Copy link
Owner

26hzhang commented Dec 3, 2018

Sorry lah, I was wrongly use the CoNLLeval.py function, and modified it already.........

@26hzhang 26hzhang closed this as completed Dec 3, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants