Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

db2index, db2ldif, ldif2db should set non 0 exit status if buffer size limit reached. #1804

Closed
389-ds-bot opened this issue Sep 13, 2020 · 6 comments
Labels
closed: works for me Migration flag - Issue
Milestone

Comments

@389-ds-bot
Copy link

Cloned from Pagure issue: https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/48744


At the moment, if entries are skiped due to the fifo.bsize being exceeded our tools still return an exit status of 0.

With the new dynamic allocation it should be rare, if ever that an import / index task fails due to buffer size allocations.

In the case it does happen, a skipped entry is a bad situation. A skipped entry during indexing, means the entry can't be searched for. A skipped entry in an import means the entry no longer exists.

As a result, our tasks in the case of an entry being skipped, should set a non-0 return code.

@389-ds-bot 389-ds-bot added the closed: works for me Migration flag - Issue label Sep 13, 2020
@389-ds-bot 389-ds-bot added this to the 1.3.7 backlog milestone Sep 13, 2020
@389-ds-bot
Copy link
Author

Comment from nhosoi (@nhosoi) at 2016-05-13 02:16:20

Per triage, push the target milestone to 1.3.6.

@389-ds-bot
Copy link
Author

Comment from nhosoi (@nhosoi) at 2017-02-11 22:59:47

Metadata Update from @nhosoi:

  • Issue assigned to nhosoi
  • Issue set to the milestone: 1.3.6.0

@389-ds-bot
Copy link
Author

Comment from mreynolds (@mreynolds389) at 2017-05-08 22:22:01

Metadata Update from @mreynolds389:

  • Issue close_status updated to: None
  • Issue set to the milestone: 1.3.7 backlog (was: 1.3.6.0)

@389-ds-bot
Copy link
Author

Comment from mreynolds (@mreynolds389) at 2017-07-19 21:33:10

Metadata Update from @mreynolds389:

  • Issue assigned to mreynolds389 (was: nhosoi)

@389-ds-bot
Copy link
Author

Comment from firstyear (@Firstyear) at 2017-07-20 00:51:43

I think we can close this as I eliminated the fault. the fife buffer dynamically expands during the operation rather than returning an error.

@389-ds-bot
Copy link
Author

Comment from mreynolds (@mreynolds389) at 2018-06-06 22:45:49

Metadata Update from @mreynolds389:

  • Custom field reviewstatus adjusted to None
  • Issue close_status updated to: worksforme
  • Issue status updated to: Closed (was: Open)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
closed: works for me Migration flag - Issue
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant