Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Sync maps attributes for group entries that may be invalid in AD #229

Closed
389-ds-bot opened this issue Sep 12, 2020 · 5 comments
Closed

Sync maps attributes for group entries that may be invalid in AD #229

389-ds-bot opened this issue Sep 12, 2020 · 5 comments
Labels
closed: won't fix Migration flag - Issue
Milestone

Comments

@389-ds-bot
Copy link

Cloned from Pagure issue: https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/229


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=158369

The attribute mapping for groups in the sync code includes a number of
attributes that are not actually legal on 'group' objects. They are legal
on other object classes that groups may have in AD, but not on the bare
group object class. Examples: l, ou, o.

If someone creates an entry in DS that is an ntGroup, and also has
one or more of these attributes, but is not also an ou, the sync'ed
entry add will fail on AD because of a schema violation.
@389-ds-bot 389-ds-bot added the closed: won't fix Migration flag - Issue label Sep 12, 2020
@389-ds-bot 389-ds-bot added this to the FUTURE milestone Sep 12, 2020
@389-ds-bot
Copy link
Author

Comment from rmeggins (@richm) at 2012-01-10 06:14:50

batch move to milestone future

@389-ds-bot
Copy link
Author

Comment from rmeggins (@richm) at 2012-08-14 19:57:05

set default ticket origin to Community

@389-ds-bot
Copy link
Author

Comment from nkinder (@nkinder) at 2012-08-28 04:14:50

Added initial screened field value.

@389-ds-bot
Copy link
Author

Comment from nkinder (@nkinder) at 2017-02-11 23:07:40

Metadata Update from @nkinder:

  • Issue set to the milestone: FUTURE

@389-ds-bot
Copy link
Author

Comment from mreynolds (@mreynolds389) at 2020-04-01 17:40:50

Metadata Update from @mreynolds389:

  • Custom field reviewstatus adjusted to None (was: Needs Review)
  • Issue close_status updated to: wontfix
  • Issue status updated to: Closed (was: Open)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
closed: won't fix Migration flag - Issue
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant