New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merge svrcore to ds base #2428
Comments
Comment from firstyear (@Firstyear) at 2017-08-31 01:54:41 Metadata Update from @Firstyear:
|
Comment from firstyear (@Firstyear) at 2018-02-28 00:02:24 |
Comment from firstyear (@Firstyear) at 2018-02-28 00:02:25 Metadata Update from @Firstyear:
|
Comment from mreynolds (@mreynolds389) at 2018-03-20 20:50:16 The Makefile changes merged from the PR are breaking the builds on F28. |
Comment from firstyear (@Firstyear) at 2018-03-20 23:42:20 @kenoh Said he wainted to look at this (there is another ticket open), but if this is urgent I can look today. |
Comment from mreynolds (@mreynolds389) at 2018-03-21 13:07:19 I need to a upstream build of 1.4.0 soon, so this should get fixed by the end of next week. |
Comment from mreynolds (@mreynolds389) at 2018-04-05 20:25:13 Still having a lot of problems around this. I know we need to add the following code
Even with this we can not build DS upstream do to complaints about libldaputil.la not being found. So right now we can not build master branch on F28 or F29, but I guess that's another issue |
Comment from mreynolds (@mreynolds389) at 2018-04-05 20:25:24 Metadata Update from @mreynolds389:
|
Comment from mhonek (@kenoh) at 2018-04-09 16:16:54 As per #2611#comment-504253 building on F28+ works. Also, the actual svrcore seems to work just fine. Closing as fixed. |
Comment from mhonek (@kenoh) at 2018-04-09 16:16:54 Metadata Update from @kenoh:
|
Comment from firstyear (@Firstyear) at 2018-04-10 07:13:17 Great, thank you @kenoh Sorry to cause so much grief :( |
Comment from mreynolds (@mreynolds389) at 2018-04-13 19:04:35 Reopening, looks like there are rpm issues on F28 results:
package 389-ds-base-devel-1.4.0.7-1.fc28.x86_64 requires libsvrcore.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed. This needs to be investigated... |
Comment from mreynolds (@mreynolds389) at 2018-04-13 19:04:35 Metadata Update from @mreynolds389:
|
Comment from mreynolds (@mreynolds389) at 2018-04-13 19:57:27 Upgrades also do not work: root@hp-dl360g5-01 rpms]# rpm -iUvh * |
Comment from mreynolds (@mreynolds389) at 2018-04-16 15:31:23 Got it working, just need to run some lib389 tests before sending out for review... |
Comment from mhonek (@kenoh) at 2018-05-11 16:37:02 @mreynolds389 Seems everything is running smoothly now regarding the merged svrcore. Are we good to close this issue? |
Comment from mreynolds (@mreynolds389) at 2018-05-11 16:38:29 Yes, closing it out... |
Comment from mreynolds (@mreynolds389) at 2018-05-11 16:38:31 Metadata Update from @mreynolds389:
|
Cloned from Pagure issue: https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49369
Issue Description
We are now the only consumer of the svrcore project. To simplify our build and source trees, we should roll this into the ds source tree.
We can continue to produce a seperate svrcore rpm from this, but just built from the ds source tree.
Likely we would ship 389-ds-svrcore which obsoletes the svrcore rpms set.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: