We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Cloned from Pagure issue: https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49453
With pwdhash now respecting fips and others, the use of hash lists in passwd.py is a mistake as we may not keep it up to date.
By default use the scheme from pwdhash instead.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Comment from firstyear (@Firstyear) at 2017-11-15 06:45:03
Sorry, something went wrong.
Comment from firstyear (@Firstyear) at 2017-11-15 06:45:04
Metadata Update from @Firstyear:
Comment from lkrispen (@elkris) at 2017-11-17 11:35:54
Metadata Update from @elkris:
Comment from firstyear (@Firstyear) at 2017-11-20 10:52:28
commit 955510c
Comment from firstyear (@Firstyear) at 2017-11-20 10:52:32
No branches or pull requests
Cloned from Pagure issue: https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49453
Issue Description
With pwdhash now respecting fips and others, the use of hash lists in passwd.py is a mistake as we may not keep it up to date.
By default use the scheme from pwdhash instead.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: