Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Some operations are seen as NOOP that does not update the RUV, so replication can loop on it #2525

Open
389-ds-bot opened this issue Sep 13, 2020 · 3 comments
Milestone

Comments

@389-ds-bot
Copy link

Cloned from Pagure issue: https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49466


Issue Description

Some operation are considered as NOOP in urp (like DEL on a tombstone).
In such case the local RUV is not updated. This can lead to symptoms like https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49463

Received operation should update the RUV when they are processed. Even if the processing conclude it is a NOOP.

Package Version and Platform

NOOP have existed since at least since 1.3

Steps to reproduce

It can use the testcase of https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49463

Actual results

RUV is not updated on NOOP

Expected results

RUV should be update with NOOP

@389-ds-bot 389-ds-bot added this to the 1.4.4 milestone Sep 13, 2020
@389-ds-bot
Copy link
Author

Comment from tbordaz (@tbordaz) at 2017-11-24 11:01:46

Metadata Update from @tbordaz:

  • Custom field component adjusted to None
  • Custom field origin adjusted to IPA
  • Custom field reviewstatus adjusted to None
  • Custom field type adjusted to None
  • Custom field version adjusted to None

@389-ds-bot
Copy link
Author

Comment from mreynolds (@mreynolds389) at 2018-02-27 18:20:59

Metadata Update from @mreynolds389:

  • Issue set to the milestone: 1.4.0

@389-ds-bot
Copy link
Author

Comment from vashirov (@vashirov) at 2020-02-19 16:58:32

Metadata Update from @vashirov:

  • Issue priority set to: normal
  • Issue set to the milestone: 1.4.4 (was: 1.4.0)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant