New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
PR - Issue 49850 -ldbm_get_nonleaf_ids() painfully slow for databases with many non-leaf entries #4152
Comments
Comment from firstyear (@Firstyear) at 2020-05-21 04:11:43 I don't see anything wrong with this test. @vashirov or @droideck ? |
Comment from spichugi (@droideck) at 2020-05-21 16:21:09 small indentation issue |
Comment from spichugi (@droideck) at 2020-05-21 16:22:24 I think there is no reason to mention BZ number in the commit message. |
Comment from spichugi (@droideck) at 2020-05-21 16:22:35 The rest looks good to me. |
Comment from sgouvern at 2020-05-25 10:56:17 rebased onto bed349d7463150ba7febf62365f70cdcfd44e09f |
Comment from sgouvern at 2020-05-25 12:00:28 rebased onto 9d5fe06 |
Comment from sgouvern at 2020-05-25 12:09:05 Thanks @Firstyear and @droideck for your review. |
Comment from spichugi (@droideck) at 2020-05-25 17:11:48 LGTM! Ack |
Comment from firstyear (@Firstyear) at 2020-05-26 01:10:30 @droideck Worth remembering that not everyone has commit rights, so when you ack sometimes you have to do the merge yourself :) |
Comment from firstyear (@Firstyear) at 2020-05-26 01:10:53 Pull-Request has been merged by Firstyear |
Comment from sgouvern at 2020-05-26 09:30:01 Thanks for the go and for the merge :) |
Patch |
Cloned from Pagure Pull-Request: https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/51099
Description:
With a very large database, gathering non-leaf IDs for creating the ancestorid index took an enormous amount of time.
This test is to verify the fix for this problem.
Resolves: #2909
Author: sgouvern
Reviewed by: Firstyear, droideck
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: