Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

FS-229 Pass codeblocks to tut #233

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 18, 2017
Merged

FS-229 Pass codeblocks to tut #233

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 18, 2017

Conversation

diesalbla
Copy link
Contributor

This PR fulfills #229.

We pass some of the blocks of code in the documentation to the tut
format. We leave as Scala those that are not to be executed.

@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Apr 18, 2017

Codecov Report

Merging #233 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #233   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   76.17%   76.17%           
=======================================
  Files          35       35           
  Lines         298      298           
  Branches        3        3           
=======================================
  Hits          227      227           
  Misses         71       71

@raulraja
Copy link
Contributor

Looks great!, need to resolve conflicts before this can be merged.

@diesalbla diesalbla force-pushed the diesalbla-229_Docs_Tut branch 2 times, most recently from f17837d to c485590 Compare April 18, 2017 19:59
We pass some of the blocks of code in the documentation to the `tut`
format. We leave as  `Scala` those that are not to be executed.
@diesalbla diesalbla merged commit fc942e1 into master Apr 18, 2017
@diesalbla diesalbla deleted the diesalbla-229_Docs_Tut branch April 18, 2017 22:11
@anamariamv anamariamv added this to Done in freestyle Jul 19, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants