Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Error handling inconsistency #1

Closed
Automation51D opened this issue Sep 3, 2021 · 0 comments
Closed

Error handling inconsistency #1

Automation51D opened this issue Sep 3, 2021 · 0 comments
Assignees
@fatima51Degrees
Labels
status: released/4.3.3 This change was released in the specified version type: feature-request New feature

Comments

@Automation51D
Copy link
Contributor

The Java and .NET implementations have the SuppressProcessException setting, which allows the user to configure the behavior of the pipeline when errors occur within flow elements. (i.e. throw an error or just log it) By default, this setting is false.

Node does not have this setting, and will always behave as if it is set to true.
This should be addressed to make it consistent with other languages and prevent errors from being unexpectedly hidden from the user.
@Automation51D Automation51D added type: feature-request New feature status: to be scheduled This item has not been scheduled for a particular release labels Sep 3, 2021
@fatima51Degrees fatima51Degrees self-assigned this Sep 15, 2021
@fatima51Degrees fatima51Degrees removed the status: to be scheduled This item has not been scheduled for a particular release label Sep 16, 2021
@Joseph51D Joseph51D added the status: released/4.3.3 This change was released in the specified version label Sep 27, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@fatima51Degrees fatima51Degrees

Labels
status: released/4.3.3 This change was released in the specified version type: feature-request New feature
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@Joseph51D @Automation51D @fatima51Degrees