Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Any reason why IntegerField is the only type supported? #61

Open
kingbuzzman opened this issue Jun 30, 2020 · 2 comments
Open

Any reason why IntegerField is the only type supported? #61

kingbuzzman opened this issue Jun 30, 2020 · 2 comments

Comments

@kingbuzzman
Copy link

We have a lot of string tuples, while I agree that it would take infinitely less space in the db (space is cheap now a days); we have dba's that deal with the db directly and the strings are a lot more descriptive. I'm curious why the option is not available. Thank you.
@kingbuzzman
Copy link
Author

Would a change like this be acceptable? master...kingbuzzman:master -- ps im not a fan of StrEnum, it's just Enum can't be used now.

@michelTho
Copy link

I would love to see this kind of feature too, string enums are a real gain of time when needed to dig into the database

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@kingbuzzman @michelTho