Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Distinction between frequently used apps and alphabetical apps #2326

Closed
1 task done
trigili opened this issue Jul 6, 2023 · 1 comment
Closed
1 task done

Distinction between frequently used apps and alphabetical apps #2326

trigili opened this issue Jul 6, 2023 · 1 comment
Assignees

Comments

@trigili
Copy link

trigili commented Jul 6, 2023

Is your feature request related to a problem?

It's difficult to tell at a glance where the frequently used apps in my app drawer end and where the alphabetical ones begin.

Describe the solution you'd like

Some sort of subtle indicator or distinction between frequently used apps and the rest of the apps for a given letter in the app drawer. For example, the option to have the names for frequently used apps in bold, or a small divider between the end of the frequently used apps in the beginning of the alphabetical ones.

Feature Request Procedure

@Amorphous404
Copy link

Hi @trigili, Thank you for your suggestion! We internally discussed this option and decided not to proceed with it at this point. The main reasons being it might clutter the app list, and we don't find it impactful enough and will require us to add a toggle to deactivate it, which we reserve for highly requested and functional features. However, we'll keep an eye on the demand, and if anything changes, we'll reconsider your request.

In the meantime, if you prefer the standard sort list, you can achieve it by going to Niagara Settings -> Features -> and disabling "Sort all app list by usage."

Thank you for your understanding,

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants