Test the complete flow with the validation data on the drive

[RobvdDuim]

Installing

Is the documentation sufficient for cloning the repo and getting it to run locally?

Test the flow

Again is the documentation intiutive and sufficient so that the user can work with it?
Other than that does the code with the data the project was designed for (validation data on drive).
Extra: Are there points that data of other forms could cause major flaws that would be nice to fix? Or are there steps to be added for a better flow?

[RobvdDuim]

• Remove required status for the fields color and size from Subject
• Filling in dates should be in a certain way. Either add placeholder text, add explanation or add widget to make this easier
• Is location in a Deployment always necessary? Nvm: it is already not required
• When sensortype_A (ground truth) can not be extracted from the subject annotation project errors occur in later steps. Make exception and warning
• Generating activity annotation tasks gives index error

[RobvdDuim]

Notes:

• Adding begin and end datetime to Deployments feels cumbersome and useless, since it is copying from the sensordata. Wouldn't it be possible to let deployments be SensorData-Subject links

[EriktHove]

• delete project does not delete offset annotation project

[EriktHove]

Load JSON and check output if taps are at expected points in data