Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Profile the SDC implementation in the Microphysics integrators #60

Closed
dwillcox opened this issue Oct 16, 2017 · 1 comment
Closed

Profile the SDC implementation in the Microphysics integrators #60

dwillcox opened this issue Oct 16, 2017 · 1 comment

Comments

@dwillcox
Copy link
Member

Max has suggested we profile the SDC integration to determine how expensive the EOS calls really are.

The motivation for this is that the EOS calls use rho, e as input variables and it may be worthwhile to think about how to formulate T integration source terms so we could use rho, T as input variables to the EOS instead.

The cost of the EOS should be more apparent using tabulated rates, so this is related to issue #12

@zingale
Copy link
Member

zingale commented Jan 28, 2022

I don't think that this is needed anymore with the new set of integration variables

@zingale zingale closed this as completed Jan 28, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants