You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Right now, sorting of resources causes small delays on huge collections (e.g. 5000 of pictures). After addition of persistence of sorting preferences, this delay is imposed after frequent actions: opening a folder and going back from gallery mode to resources grid.
It may be possible to perform sorting in a smarter way:
find top T resources and put K of them into visible frame;
spawn sorting of the rest of resources in background;
allow the user to do his stuff.
Implementation can be non-trivial, but performance would be better: blocking phase:T * N operations to find top T resources (where N is number of all resources) background phase: normal sorting of N - T elements
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Right now, sorting of resources causes small delays on huge collections (e.g. 5000 of pictures). After addition of persistence of sorting preferences, this delay is imposed after frequent actions: opening a folder and going back from gallery mode to resources grid.
It may be possible to perform sorting in a smarter way:
Implementation can be non-trivial, but performance would be better:
blocking phase: T * N operations to find top T resources (where N is number of all resources)
background phase: normal sorting of N - T elements
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: