You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I am trying to use DAPLink project for our custom boards. We currently use GCC ARM as our reference compiler, so, as I saw in #197 there are some developments (thanks @flit) in this area.
I have built successfully DAPLink for a K20 with our board using feature/gcc , and it is working as expected, it starts, it programs the main MCU and so on. But, I am having an issue, when it flashes the board, DAPLink does not restart.
It seems to be non-fatal but it is. If I upload multiple binaries with different names, the older binaries are not deleted and binaries are kept in the memory.
This can causes 2 problems:
Device can run out of memory.
When running mbed tests over the board, the binaries are kept and (I think it is due alphabetical selections) it takes incorrect binaries to run the tests, so it fails!.
Could you try using the experimental_compilers branch? I has seen a lot of work since flit:feature/gcc and I don't remember seeing this issue when doing my tests on k20dx (I use a FRDM-K64F).
Hi everyone,
I am trying to use DAPLink project for our custom boards. We currently use GCC ARM as our reference compiler, so, as I saw in #197 there are some developments (thanks @flit) in this area.
I have built successfully DAPLink for a K20 with our board using feature/gcc , and it is working as expected, it starts, it programs the main MCU and so on. But, I am having an issue, when it flashes the board, DAPLink does not restart.
It seems to be non-fatal but it is. If I upload multiple binaries with different names, the older binaries are not deleted and binaries are kept in the memory.
This can causes 2 problems:
By exploring the code, I saw that the problem is here: https://github.com/ARMmbed/DAPLink/blob/master/source/daplink/drag-n-drop/vfs_user.c#L309
If I change this
if
to:I saw that it is a change added in v0254 version, see commit.
Can anyone give me an idea if I need to configure anything?
Thanks in advance.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: