Nordic SDK and SoftDevice

[metc]

Hello,

I am developing several BLE projects using the nRF51 chip (with home made hardware). Since today, I always used my own C++ libraries / wrapper around the Nordic's SDK.
This library seams to be very interesting and give a very convenient C++ API with a great abstraction to work with BLE on nRF51.

Before starting using your library, I have a few questions to ask (because I did not found much documentation):

1. The project includes nRF5xGattClient.h and nRF5xGattServer.h. This means that the library supports both S110 and S120 SoftDevices ?
2. The Nordic SDK is included in the source files, why this ? On which SDK version is this project based on ? Are some sources files of the SDK modified for this project ?

Thanks in advance for these information.

[ghost]

it supports S110 and S130. I think the SDK files are are from the 8.x.x SDK, but the maintainer can correct me if I'm wrong on that point.

[rgrover]

This library (ble-nrf51822) is meant to be the adaptation layer between mbed OS's BLE_API and the Nordic SDK/softdevice. Documentation for the use of BLE_API can be found in many places, such as https://github.com/armmbed/ble, https://docs.mbed.com/docs/ble-intros/en/latest/, and https://developer.mbed.org/teams/Bluetooth-Low-Energy/code/.

We're currently using the S130 softdevice, which includes support for both gatt client and gatt server. We'll soon have a config option of switching to the S110 for those users who would benefit from a little extra SRAM for their application.

We currently use v8.x.x of the Nordic SDK.

[metc]

Thank you for our responses and links to the doc.
@rgrover Does the nordic-sdk/components contains modified files or are they the official Nordic SDK v8 files ?

The option you mention to switch to S110 is useful (especial for peripheral code running on the 16k RAM chip). Will also the S120 (for central multi-link) be supported in the future ? 😊

S132 (for nRF52) is API compatible with S130, also looking for the nRF52 support in the future 🎶

[rgrover]

@metc: files under 'nordic-sdk/components' are fetched from the Nordic SDK. In some cases, minor changes have been made to allow working with our C++ sources; in other rare cases, there may be white-space diffs. Otherwise, the sources are taken directly from Nordic.

We currently do not plan to add support for S120 exclusively. But this should not be difficult to accomplish if you follow the changes we do to support S110. Perhaps you can consider submitting a pull request to accomplish S120. If you or someone from the community accomplishes this, then we can continue supporting it.

Support for the nRF52 is on our roadmap. It will arrive soon.

[metc]

Thank you for your answer and support.