-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Allow configuring MBEDTLS_TLS_EXT_CID at compile time #4413
Allow configuring MBEDTLS_TLS_EXT_CID at compile time #4413
Conversation
95d3812
to
e77d758
Compare
First, thanks for addressing my issue with this PR.
FMPOV, it's more important for 2.2x. The draft-ietf-tls-dtls-connection-id is currently reviewed and the requested changes so far are about terms on expressions, but not longer the used data and security functions. So, hope it gets released within the next months and then with a stable defined MAC and code points. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Re-approving after the name of the target branch was changed.
Two reviewers thus removing the "needs: reviewer" label. @hanno-arm please shout if you don't have time to review it. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM. Just needs resolving of the merge conflict.
Needs rebasing to resolve conflicts. |
The numerical identifier of the CID extension hasn't been settled yet and different implementations use values from different drafts. Allow configuring the value at compile time. Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>
e77d758
to
7dd2f50
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM.
(Reviewed the PR from the start, didn't follow the review history.)
The numerical identifier of the CID extension hasn't been settled yet and different implementations use values from different drafts. Allow configuring the value at compile time as discussed in #3892 (comment).
This PR is for 3.0. 2.x PR