Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

S2 names should use COG Identifier #30

Closed
Jlrine2 opened this issue Dec 2, 2020 · 2 comments
Closed

S2 names should use COG Identifier #30

Jlrine2 opened this issue Dec 2, 2020 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@Jlrine2
Copy link
Contributor

Jlrine2 commented Dec 2, 2020

S2 names are currently given using the ESA identifier (e.g. S2B_MSIL2A_20200903T151809_N0214_R068_T22WEB_20200903T194353), we should change to the COG identifier (e.g. S2B_22WEB_20200903_0_L2A) because that's what Mark's pair list uses.

Also, consider validation of granule names and pairs here:

  • both are valid names
  • both are from the same mission
@Jlrine2 Jlrine2 added the enhancement New feature or request label Dec 2, 2020
@jhkennedy
Copy link
Contributor

I wonder if we should support both the ESA and COG identifiers, and translate ESA -> COG for processing

@jhkennedy
Copy link
Contributor

Done in #33

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants