Optional parameters

[matej2]

This adds functionality for optional parameters and resolves a bug with default table names: https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/1.10/ref/models/options/#db-table

Edit: As an alternative to db name we can change confiuration in admin file so that the app wil take in account default table name.

[matej2]

@Abdenasser is this PR ok or should I add something? Can you please review it? I went trought quality report and i dont think we could further optimize it since I added parameters...

[sourcery-ai]

Sourcery Code Quality Report

✅  Merging this PR will increase code quality in the affected files by 0.02%.

Quality metrics	Before	After	Change
Complexity	0.55 ⭐	0.56 ⭐	0.01 👎
Method Length	57.74 ⭐	58.09 ⭐	0.35 👎
Working memory	7.91 🙂	7.89 🙂	-0.02 👍
Quality	77.50% ⭐	77.52% ⭐	0.02% 👍

Other metrics	Before	After	Change
Lines	1125	1128	3

Changed files	Quality Before	Quality After	Quality Change
dr_scaffold/generators.py	83.65% ⭐	83.59% ⭐	-0.06% 👎
dr_scaffold/scaffold_templates/model_templates.py	51.73% 🙂	51.73% 🙂	0.00%
tests/test_generator.py	75.71% ⭐	75.71% ⭐	0.00%

Here are some functions in these files that still need a tune-up:

File	Function	Complexity	Length	Working Memory	Quality	Recommendation
tests/test_generator.py	TestGenerator.test_generate_urls	0 ⭐	170 😞	12 😞	57.30% 🙂	Try splitting into smaller methods. Extract out complex expressions
dr_scaffold/generators.py	ModelGenerator.get_fields_string	8 ⭐	109 🙂	11 😞	58.05% 🙂	Extract out complex expressions
tests/test_generator.py	TestGenerator.test_generate_views	0 ⭐	151 😞	11 😞	60.92% 🙂	Try splitting into smaller methods. Extract out complex expressions
tests/test_generator.py	TestGenerator.test_register_models_to_admin	0 ⭐	131 😞	11 😞	63.15% 🙂	Try splitting into smaller methods. Extract out complex expressions
tests/test_generator.py	TestGenerator.test_generate_serializer	0 ⭐	131 😞	11 😞	63.15% 🙂	Try splitting into smaller methods. Extract out complex expressions

Legend and Explanation

The emojis denote the absolute quality of the code:

• ⭐ excellent
• 🙂 good
• 😞 poor
• ⛔ very poor

The 👍 and 👎 indicate whether the quality has improved or gotten worse with this pull request.

---

Please see our documentation here for details on how these metrics are calculated.

We are actively working on this report - lots more documentation and extra metrics to come!

Help us improve this quality report!